Home-ownership and pensions: Negative correlation, but no trade-off

N. Delfani, J. de Deken, C.L. Dewilde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper qualifies the role of home-ownership as an income complement for the elderly by taking the institutional context into account. We argue that a strategy of asset-based welfare focused on the promotion of home-ownership is not universally applicable, but depends on how housing and pension provision are organised. Based on the extent of commodification in housing and pensions, we distinguish four types of institutional contexts. We argue that, since relying on housing wealth as a pension essentially boils down to a market-based approach to welfare provision, this strategy is more likely to occur when both housing and pensions are largely commodified, which is only the case in the liberal welfare states. The conclusion of a trade-off between the rate of home-ownership and spending on pensions often referred to in prior work is unlikely to hold universally when differences between housing and pension provision across contexts are taken into account.
Keywords: home-ownership, welfare state, asset-based welfare, commodification, pensions
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-676
JournalHousing Studies
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

pension
trade-off
ownership
housing
welfare
welfare provision
welfare state
assets
income
market
promotion

Cite this

Delfani, N. ; de Deken, J. ; Dewilde, C.L. / Home-ownership and pensions : Negative correlation, but no trade-off. In: Housing Studies. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 657-676.
@article{8aa8bfdc13bb4ce68d92b45fc8d274b4,
title = "Home-ownership and pensions: Negative correlation, but no trade-off",
abstract = "This paper qualifies the role of home-ownership as an income complement for the elderly by taking the institutional context into account. We argue that a strategy of asset-based welfare focused on the promotion of home-ownership is not universally applicable, but depends on how housing and pension provision are organised. Based on the extent of commodification in housing and pensions, we distinguish four types of institutional contexts. We argue that, since relying on housing wealth as a pension essentially boils down to a market-based approach to welfare provision, this strategy is more likely to occur when both housing and pensions are largely commodified, which is only the case in the liberal welfare states. The conclusion of a trade-off between the rate of home-ownership and spending on pensions often referred to in prior work is unlikely to hold universally when differences between housing and pension provision across contexts are taken into account.Keywords: home-ownership, welfare state, asset-based welfare, commodification, pensions",
author = "N. Delfani and {de Deken}, J. and C.L. Dewilde",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/02673037.2014.882495",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "657--676",
journal = "Housing Studies",
issn = "0267-3037",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "5",

}

Home-ownership and pensions : Negative correlation, but no trade-off. / Delfani, N.; de Deken, J.; Dewilde, C.L.

In: Housing Studies, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2014, p. 657-676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Home-ownership and pensions

T2 - Negative correlation, but no trade-off

AU - Delfani, N.

AU - de Deken, J.

AU - Dewilde, C.L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper qualifies the role of home-ownership as an income complement for the elderly by taking the institutional context into account. We argue that a strategy of asset-based welfare focused on the promotion of home-ownership is not universally applicable, but depends on how housing and pension provision are organised. Based on the extent of commodification in housing and pensions, we distinguish four types of institutional contexts. We argue that, since relying on housing wealth as a pension essentially boils down to a market-based approach to welfare provision, this strategy is more likely to occur when both housing and pensions are largely commodified, which is only the case in the liberal welfare states. The conclusion of a trade-off between the rate of home-ownership and spending on pensions often referred to in prior work is unlikely to hold universally when differences between housing and pension provision across contexts are taken into account.Keywords: home-ownership, welfare state, asset-based welfare, commodification, pensions

AB - This paper qualifies the role of home-ownership as an income complement for the elderly by taking the institutional context into account. We argue that a strategy of asset-based welfare focused on the promotion of home-ownership is not universally applicable, but depends on how housing and pension provision are organised. Based on the extent of commodification in housing and pensions, we distinguish four types of institutional contexts. We argue that, since relying on housing wealth as a pension essentially boils down to a market-based approach to welfare provision, this strategy is more likely to occur when both housing and pensions are largely commodified, which is only the case in the liberal welfare states. The conclusion of a trade-off between the rate of home-ownership and spending on pensions often referred to in prior work is unlikely to hold universally when differences between housing and pension provision across contexts are taken into account.Keywords: home-ownership, welfare state, asset-based welfare, commodification, pensions

U2 - 10.1080/02673037.2014.882495

DO - 10.1080/02673037.2014.882495

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 657

EP - 676

JO - Housing Studies

JF - Housing Studies

SN - 0267-3037

IS - 5

ER -