Homeless drug users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Profile, way of life, and the need for assistance

A Lempens, D van de Mheen*, C Barendregt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Decreasing the number of homeless drug users is one of the main characteristics of inner city drugs policy. The present study selected an urban-ethnographic perspective (the subculture theory) in order to explore why one drug user is homeless and another 7 not, and to attempt to describe and define the homeless and their immediate social environment. These issues were formulated into the following research questions:

1. What are the sociodemographic characteristics of homeless drug users in Rotterdam, and do they differ from domiciled drug users?

2. What are their living conditions?

3. What are the reasons for being homeless?

4. Does the period of homelessness play a role in the need to change one's lifestyle?

Five research methods were employed for this study: a literature search, interviews with key persons, field notes from community fieldworkers, a survey among drug users (n = 204), and photographic reports from six homeless users. Data were collected in 1998/1999. The results document that in our study population there were more women, more illegal persons, and more foreigners than among domiciled drug users, and that the homeless group used heroin and cocaine on more days. A large proportion of the homeless users had no identity papers and no health insurance. This did not, however, lead to more self-reported sickness or a higher prevalence of infectious diseases compared with nonhomeless drug users. Easily accessible (low threshold) social care centers and assistance are very important. Few of the homeless had voluntarily chosen a homeless life-most describe an event that was a trigger for their homelessness. The average duration of being homeless was 17 months, and the longer someone had been homeless the less inclined they were to change their situation. This paper also discusses policymaking implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-375
JournalSubstance Use & Misuse
Volume38
Issue number3-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • homeless
  • homelessness
  • marginalized drug users
  • subculture theory
  • trigger
  • problem zones

Cite this

@article{75a17011431b4926b77edcab67b7363b,
title = "Homeless drug users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Profile, way of life, and the need for assistance",
abstract = "Decreasing the number of homeless drug users is one of the main characteristics of inner city drugs policy. The present study selected an urban-ethnographic perspective (the subculture theory) in order to explore why one drug user is homeless and another 7 not, and to attempt to describe and define the homeless and their immediate social environment. These issues were formulated into the following research questions:1. What are the sociodemographic characteristics of homeless drug users in Rotterdam, and do they differ from domiciled drug users?2. What are their living conditions?3. What are the reasons for being homeless?4. Does the period of homelessness play a role in the need to change one's lifestyle?Five research methods were employed for this study: a literature search, interviews with key persons, field notes from community fieldworkers, a survey among drug users (n = 204), and photographic reports from six homeless users. Data were collected in 1998/1999. The results document that in our study population there were more women, more illegal persons, and more foreigners than among domiciled drug users, and that the homeless group used heroin and cocaine on more days. A large proportion of the homeless users had no identity papers and no health insurance. This did not, however, lead to more self-reported sickness or a higher prevalence of infectious diseases compared with nonhomeless drug users. Easily accessible (low threshold) social care centers and assistance are very important. Few of the homeless had voluntarily chosen a homeless life-most describe an event that was a trigger for their homelessness. The average duration of being homeless was 17 months, and the longer someone had been homeless the less inclined they were to change their situation. This paper also discusses policymaking implications.",
keywords = "homeless, homelessness, marginalized drug users, subculture theory, trigger, problem zones",
author = "A Lempens and {van de Mheen}, D and C Barendregt",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1081/JA-120017377",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "339--375",
journal = "Substance Use & Misuse",
issn = "1082-6084",
publisher = "Marcel Dekker Inc.",
number = "3-6",

}

Homeless drug users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands : Profile, way of life, and the need for assistance. / Lempens, A; van de Mheen, D; Barendregt, C.

In: Substance Use & Misuse, Vol. 38, No. 3-6, 2003, p. 339-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Homeless drug users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands

T2 - Profile, way of life, and the need for assistance

AU - Lempens, A

AU - van de Mheen, D

AU - Barendregt, C

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Decreasing the number of homeless drug users is one of the main characteristics of inner city drugs policy. The present study selected an urban-ethnographic perspective (the subculture theory) in order to explore why one drug user is homeless and another 7 not, and to attempt to describe and define the homeless and their immediate social environment. These issues were formulated into the following research questions:1. What are the sociodemographic characteristics of homeless drug users in Rotterdam, and do they differ from domiciled drug users?2. What are their living conditions?3. What are the reasons for being homeless?4. Does the period of homelessness play a role in the need to change one's lifestyle?Five research methods were employed for this study: a literature search, interviews with key persons, field notes from community fieldworkers, a survey among drug users (n = 204), and photographic reports from six homeless users. Data were collected in 1998/1999. The results document that in our study population there were more women, more illegal persons, and more foreigners than among domiciled drug users, and that the homeless group used heroin and cocaine on more days. A large proportion of the homeless users had no identity papers and no health insurance. This did not, however, lead to more self-reported sickness or a higher prevalence of infectious diseases compared with nonhomeless drug users. Easily accessible (low threshold) social care centers and assistance are very important. Few of the homeless had voluntarily chosen a homeless life-most describe an event that was a trigger for their homelessness. The average duration of being homeless was 17 months, and the longer someone had been homeless the less inclined they were to change their situation. This paper also discusses policymaking implications.

AB - Decreasing the number of homeless drug users is one of the main characteristics of inner city drugs policy. The present study selected an urban-ethnographic perspective (the subculture theory) in order to explore why one drug user is homeless and another 7 not, and to attempt to describe and define the homeless and their immediate social environment. These issues were formulated into the following research questions:1. What are the sociodemographic characteristics of homeless drug users in Rotterdam, and do they differ from domiciled drug users?2. What are their living conditions?3. What are the reasons for being homeless?4. Does the period of homelessness play a role in the need to change one's lifestyle?Five research methods were employed for this study: a literature search, interviews with key persons, field notes from community fieldworkers, a survey among drug users (n = 204), and photographic reports from six homeless users. Data were collected in 1998/1999. The results document that in our study population there were more women, more illegal persons, and more foreigners than among domiciled drug users, and that the homeless group used heroin and cocaine on more days. A large proportion of the homeless users had no identity papers and no health insurance. This did not, however, lead to more self-reported sickness or a higher prevalence of infectious diseases compared with nonhomeless drug users. Easily accessible (low threshold) social care centers and assistance are very important. Few of the homeless had voluntarily chosen a homeless life-most describe an event that was a trigger for their homelessness. The average duration of being homeless was 17 months, and the longer someone had been homeless the less inclined they were to change their situation. This paper also discusses policymaking implications.

KW - homeless

KW - homelessness

KW - marginalized drug users

KW - subculture theory

KW - trigger

KW - problem zones

U2 - 10.1081/JA-120017377

DO - 10.1081/JA-120017377

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 339

EP - 375

JO - Substance Use & Misuse

JF - Substance Use & Misuse

SN - 1082-6084

IS - 3-6

ER -