How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment

R. Lalive, J.C. van Ours, J. Zweimüller

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

242 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper uses microdata to evaluate the impact of an increase in maximum bene.t duration on the steady-state unemployment rate.We draw on policy changes in Austria that extended maximum benefit duration from 30 to 52 weeks for individuals above age 50 and from 30 to 39 weeks for individuals between ages 40 and 49.We use these changes to estimate the causal impact of benefit duration on labor market flows and find that (i) the policy changes lead to an increase in the steady-state unemployment rate between 20 % and 50 %; (ii) surprisingly, most of the increase is due to an increase in the inflow into unemployment, whereas the decrease in the outflow from unemployment is modest; (iii) the effects are stronger for women than for men, but are otherwise rather robust across population subgroups.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherMicroeconomics
Number of pages31
Volume2006-94
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2006-94

Fingerprint

Equilibrium unemployment
Unemployment
Policy change
Unemployment rate
Austria
Micro data
Labour market flows

Keywords

  • maximum benefit duration
  • unemployment duration
  • unemployment inflow
  • equilibrium unemployment

Cite this

Lalive, R., van Ours, J. C., & Zweimüller, J. (2006). How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2006-94). Tilburg: Microeconomics.
Lalive, R. ; van Ours, J.C. ; Zweimüller, J. / How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment. Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2006. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{9c1e2e2f85cf48b2b6088e575431fa2e,
title = "How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment",
abstract = "This paper uses microdata to evaluate the impact of an increase in maximum bene.t duration on the steady-state unemployment rate.We draw on policy changes in Austria that extended maximum benefit duration from 30 to 52 weeks for individuals above age 50 and from 30 to 39 weeks for individuals between ages 40 and 49.We use these changes to estimate the causal impact of benefit duration on labor market flows and find that (i) the policy changes lead to an increase in the steady-state unemployment rate between 20 {\%} and 50 {\%}; (ii) surprisingly, most of the increase is due to an increase in the inflow into unemployment, whereas the decrease in the outflow from unemployment is modest; (iii) the effects are stronger for women than for men, but are otherwise rather robust across population subgroups.",
keywords = "maximum benefit duration, unemployment duration, unemployment inflow, equilibrium unemployment",
author = "R. Lalive and {van Ours}, J.C. and J. Zweim{\"u}ller",
note = "Subsequently published in the Journal of Population Economics (2011) Pagination: 31",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "2006-94",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Microeconomics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Microeconomics",

}

Lalive, R, van Ours, JC & Zweimüller, J 2006 'How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2006-94, Microeconomics, Tilburg.

How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment. / Lalive, R.; van Ours, J.C.; Zweimüller, J.

Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2006. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2006-94).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment

AU - Lalive, R.

AU - van Ours, J.C.

AU - Zweimüller, J.

N1 - Subsequently published in the Journal of Population Economics (2011) Pagination: 31

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper uses microdata to evaluate the impact of an increase in maximum bene.t duration on the steady-state unemployment rate.We draw on policy changes in Austria that extended maximum benefit duration from 30 to 52 weeks for individuals above age 50 and from 30 to 39 weeks for individuals between ages 40 and 49.We use these changes to estimate the causal impact of benefit duration on labor market flows and find that (i) the policy changes lead to an increase in the steady-state unemployment rate between 20 % and 50 %; (ii) surprisingly, most of the increase is due to an increase in the inflow into unemployment, whereas the decrease in the outflow from unemployment is modest; (iii) the effects are stronger for women than for men, but are otherwise rather robust across population subgroups.

AB - This paper uses microdata to evaluate the impact of an increase in maximum bene.t duration on the steady-state unemployment rate.We draw on policy changes in Austria that extended maximum benefit duration from 30 to 52 weeks for individuals above age 50 and from 30 to 39 weeks for individuals between ages 40 and 49.We use these changes to estimate the causal impact of benefit duration on labor market flows and find that (i) the policy changes lead to an increase in the steady-state unemployment rate between 20 % and 50 %; (ii) surprisingly, most of the increase is due to an increase in the inflow into unemployment, whereas the decrease in the outflow from unemployment is modest; (iii) the effects are stronger for women than for men, but are otherwise rather robust across population subgroups.

KW - maximum benefit duration

KW - unemployment duration

KW - unemployment inflow

KW - equilibrium unemployment

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2006-94

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment

PB - Microeconomics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Lalive R, van Ours JC, Zweimüller J. How Changes in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Equilibrium Unemployment. Tilburg: Microeconomics. 2006. (CentER Discussion Paper).