How Client Advocacy and a (Mis)Matched, Foreign Decision Environment Affect Auditor Judgment

Research output: Working paperOther research output

Abstract

We investigate differences in auditor judgments when auditors are assigned to an engagement in a foreign country. We predict that the decision environment of the local firm office (operationalized as either principles-oriented or rules-oriented) will have a direct effect on experienced auditor judgment and will interact with client advocacy to influence an auditor’s recommendation on the disclosure of a contingent liability.
We find auditors with a higher (lower) level of advocacy and auditors assigned to a matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) decision environment make judgments that are more (less) favorable to the client. We also find a moderation effect in which the advocacy affects judgment to a greater (lesser) extent in the matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) local firm office environment. Our results help academics and auditors to understand the issues related to audit quality of a foreign audit engagements and international auditor labor mobility.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherSSRN
Number of pages38
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Advocacy
Auditor judgment
Auditors
Contingent liabilities
Moderation
Disclosure
Audit quality
Audit
Direct effect
Labour mobility

Keywords

  • JDM
  • disclosure
  • decision environment
  • client advocacy

Cite this

@techreport{dde3c103b4cd4d3cac7122c9688cf210,
title = "How Client Advocacy and a (Mis)Matched, Foreign Decision Environment Affect Auditor Judgment",
abstract = "We investigate differences in auditor judgments when auditors are assigned to an engagement in a foreign country. We predict that the decision environment of the local firm office (operationalized as either principles-oriented or rules-oriented) will have a direct effect on experienced auditor judgment and will interact with client advocacy to influence an auditor’s recommendation on the disclosure of a contingent liability. We find auditors with a higher (lower) level of advocacy and auditors assigned to a matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) decision environment make judgments that are more (less) favorable to the client. We also find a moderation effect in which the advocacy affects judgment to a greater (lesser) extent in the matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) local firm office environment. Our results help academics and auditors to understand the issues related to audit quality of a foreign audit engagements and international auditor labor mobility.",
keywords = "JDM, disclosure, decision environment, client advocacy",
author = "Robin Litjens and Rob Pinsker and {van Beest}, Ferdy",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
publisher = "SSRN",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "SSRN",

}

How Client Advocacy and a (Mis)Matched, Foreign Decision Environment Affect Auditor Judgment. / Litjens, Robin; Pinsker, Rob; van Beest, Ferdy.

SSRN, 2019.

Research output: Working paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - How Client Advocacy and a (Mis)Matched, Foreign Decision Environment Affect Auditor Judgment

AU - Litjens, Robin

AU - Pinsker, Rob

AU - van Beest, Ferdy

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - We investigate differences in auditor judgments when auditors are assigned to an engagement in a foreign country. We predict that the decision environment of the local firm office (operationalized as either principles-oriented or rules-oriented) will have a direct effect on experienced auditor judgment and will interact with client advocacy to influence an auditor’s recommendation on the disclosure of a contingent liability. We find auditors with a higher (lower) level of advocacy and auditors assigned to a matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) decision environment make judgments that are more (less) favorable to the client. We also find a moderation effect in which the advocacy affects judgment to a greater (lesser) extent in the matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) local firm office environment. Our results help academics and auditors to understand the issues related to audit quality of a foreign audit engagements and international auditor labor mobility.

AB - We investigate differences in auditor judgments when auditors are assigned to an engagement in a foreign country. We predict that the decision environment of the local firm office (operationalized as either principles-oriented or rules-oriented) will have a direct effect on experienced auditor judgment and will interact with client advocacy to influence an auditor’s recommendation on the disclosure of a contingent liability. We find auditors with a higher (lower) level of advocacy and auditors assigned to a matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) decision environment make judgments that are more (less) favorable to the client. We also find a moderation effect in which the advocacy affects judgment to a greater (lesser) extent in the matched (mismatched), rules-oriented (principles-oriented) local firm office environment. Our results help academics and auditors to understand the issues related to audit quality of a foreign audit engagements and international auditor labor mobility.

KW - JDM

KW - disclosure

KW - decision environment

KW - client advocacy

M3 - Working paper

BT - How Client Advocacy and a (Mis)Matched, Foreign Decision Environment Affect Auditor Judgment

PB - SSRN

ER -