How costly is it to ignore interest rate risk management in your 401(k) plan?

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

Abstract

This paper explicitly derives and explores optimal interest rate risk management for lifecycle investors in DC pension plans, and compares our results to the portfolio mix chosen in practice by Target-Date Fund (TDF) managers. We show that investments in long-term bonds play an important role in the portfolio of middle-aged individuals between ages 45 and 70. Our theoretical findings stand in sharp contrast with the investment choices made in practice; the role of long-term bonds is rather limited in the investment portfolios of 401(k) pension plan members in the US. Morningstar data on TDFs points out that the average bond duration is limited to five years and does not depend on age. We find that the absence of long-term bonds in the portfolio of a lifecycle investor can be costly, with the welfare loss peaking at 5 percent of consumption for middle-aged individuals.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherNETSPAR
Number of pages26
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Publication series

NameNetspar Discussion Paper
Volume02/2018-003

Fingerprint

Investors
Interest rate risk
Risk management
Pension plans
Life cycle
401(k) plan
Investment portfolio
Investment choice
401(k)
Welfare loss
Fund managers

Cite this

van Bilsen, S., Boelaars, I., Bovenberg, L., & Mehlkopf, R. (2018). How costly is it to ignore interest rate risk management in your 401(k) plan? (Netspar Discussion Paper; Vol. 02/2018-003). Tilburg: NETSPAR.
@techreport{f9a8f73ee83746c8860581eb80433095,
title = "How costly is it to ignore interest rate risk management in your 401(k) plan?",
abstract = "This paper explicitly derives and explores optimal interest rate risk management for lifecycle investors in DC pension plans, and compares our results to the portfolio mix chosen in practice by Target-Date Fund (TDF) managers. We show that investments in long-term bonds play an important role in the portfolio of middle-aged individuals between ages 45 and 70. Our theoretical findings stand in sharp contrast with the investment choices made in practice; the role of long-term bonds is rather limited in the investment portfolios of 401(k) pension plan members in the US. Morningstar data on TDFs points out that the average bond duration is limited to five years and does not depend on age. We find that the absence of long-term bonds in the portfolio of a lifecycle investor can be costly, with the welfare loss peaking at 5 percent of consumption for middle-aged individuals.",
author = "{van Bilsen}, Servaas and I. Boelaars and Lans Bovenberg and Roel Mehlkopf",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
language = "English",
series = "Netspar Discussion Paper",
publisher = "NETSPAR",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "NETSPAR",

}

van Bilsen, S, Boelaars, I, Bovenberg, L & Mehlkopf, R 2018 'How costly is it to ignore interest rate risk management in your 401(k) plan?' Netspar Discussion Paper, vol. 02/2018-003, NETSPAR, Tilburg.

How costly is it to ignore interest rate risk management in your 401(k) plan? / van Bilsen, Servaas; Boelaars, I.; Bovenberg, Lans; Mehlkopf, Roel.

Tilburg : NETSPAR, 2018. (Netspar Discussion Paper; Vol. 02/2018-003).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - How costly is it to ignore interest rate risk management in your 401(k) plan?

AU - van Bilsen, Servaas

AU - Boelaars, I.

AU - Bovenberg, Lans

AU - Mehlkopf, Roel

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - This paper explicitly derives and explores optimal interest rate risk management for lifecycle investors in DC pension plans, and compares our results to the portfolio mix chosen in practice by Target-Date Fund (TDF) managers. We show that investments in long-term bonds play an important role in the portfolio of middle-aged individuals between ages 45 and 70. Our theoretical findings stand in sharp contrast with the investment choices made in practice; the role of long-term bonds is rather limited in the investment portfolios of 401(k) pension plan members in the US. Morningstar data on TDFs points out that the average bond duration is limited to five years and does not depend on age. We find that the absence of long-term bonds in the portfolio of a lifecycle investor can be costly, with the welfare loss peaking at 5 percent of consumption for middle-aged individuals.

AB - This paper explicitly derives and explores optimal interest rate risk management for lifecycle investors in DC pension plans, and compares our results to the portfolio mix chosen in practice by Target-Date Fund (TDF) managers. We show that investments in long-term bonds play an important role in the portfolio of middle-aged individuals between ages 45 and 70. Our theoretical findings stand in sharp contrast with the investment choices made in practice; the role of long-term bonds is rather limited in the investment portfolios of 401(k) pension plan members in the US. Morningstar data on TDFs points out that the average bond duration is limited to five years and does not depend on age. We find that the absence of long-term bonds in the portfolio of a lifecycle investor can be costly, with the welfare loss peaking at 5 percent of consumption for middle-aged individuals.

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - Netspar Discussion Paper

BT - How costly is it to ignore interest rate risk management in your 401(k) plan?

PB - NETSPAR

CY - Tilburg

ER -