How do employees' individual learning paths differ across occupations?

A review of 10 years of empirical research

R.F. Poell, H. Lundgren, April Bang, Sean B. Justice, Victoria J. Marsick, SeoYoon Sung, Lyle Yorks

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: 

Employees are increasingly expected to organize their own human resource development activities. To what extent and how exactly employees in various organizational contexts manage to shape their individual learning paths however remains largely unclear. The purpose of this present study is to explore, leaning on the empirical Learning-Network Theory (LNT) research and its findings, how employees in different occupations create learning paths that are attuned to their specific work context.

Design/methodology/approach:

The paper reviews 23 MSc theses based on 14 distinct data sets collected between 2005 and 2015, containing approximately 1,484 employees from some 45 organizations and across various professions. The teachers, nurses, postal, software, telecom, railway and logistics company employees were mostly based in the Netherlands. The analysis focuses on learning-path types and learning-path strategies found in the 23 studies.

Findings: 

Motives, themes, activities, social contexts and facilities were found to be instrumental in explaining differences among individual learning paths. A total of 34 original learning-path types and strategies were found to cluster under 12 higher-order labels. Some of these were based on learning motive, some on learning theme, some on core learning activities, some on social learning context and a few on a combination of these elements. Overall, the socially oriented learning-path strategy was the most prevalent, as it was found among nurses, employees of software/postal/telecom, railway and logistics company employees, as well as teachers in two schools.

Originality/value: 

The paper presents the first overview of empirical studies on employee learning path(s) (strategies). In addition, it strengthens the empirical basis of the LNT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-334
JournalThe Journal of Workplace Learning
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Learning activities
  • Learning-network theory
  • Learning motives
  • Learning path
  • Learning-path strategies
  • Learning-path types
  • CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT
  • HUMAN-RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
  • NETWORK THEORY
  • PROBLEMATIC PERSPECTIVES
  • WORK
  • TIME

Cite this

Poell, R.F. ; Lundgren, H. ; Bang, April ; Justice, Sean B. ; Marsick, Victoria J. ; Sung, SeoYoon ; Yorks, Lyle. / How do employees' individual learning paths differ across occupations? A review of 10 years of empirical research. In: The Journal of Workplace Learning. 2018 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 315-334.
@article{5106564287b740f190b493251afdc1ab,
title = "How do employees' individual learning paths differ across occupations?: A review of 10 years of empirical research",
abstract = "Purpose: Employees are increasingly expected to organize their own human resource development activities. To what extent and how exactly employees in various organizational contexts manage to shape their individual learning paths however remains largely unclear. The purpose of this present study is to explore, leaning on the empirical Learning-Network Theory (LNT) research and its findings, how employees in different occupations create learning paths that are attuned to their specific work context.Design/methodology/approach:The paper reviews 23 MSc theses based on 14 distinct data sets collected between 2005 and 2015, containing approximately 1,484 employees from some 45 organizations and across various professions. The teachers, nurses, postal, software, telecom, railway and logistics company employees were mostly based in the Netherlands. The analysis focuses on learning-path types and learning-path strategies found in the 23 studies.Findings: Motives, themes, activities, social contexts and facilities were found to be instrumental in explaining differences among individual learning paths. A total of 34 original learning-path types and strategies were found to cluster under 12 higher-order labels. Some of these were based on learning motive, some on learning theme, some on core learning activities, some on social learning context and a few on a combination of these elements. Overall, the socially oriented learning-path strategy was the most prevalent, as it was found among nurses, employees of software/postal/telecom, railway and logistics company employees, as well as teachers in two schools.Originality/value: The paper presents the first overview of empirical studies on employee learning path(s) (strategies). In addition, it strengthens the empirical basis of the LNT.",
keywords = "Learning activities, Learning-network theory, Learning motives, Learning path, Learning-path strategies, Learning-path types, CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT, HUMAN-RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, NETWORK THEORY, PROBLEMATIC PERSPECTIVES, WORK, TIME",
author = "R.F. Poell and H. Lundgren and April Bang and Justice, {Sean B.} and Marsick, {Victoria J.} and SeoYoon Sung and Lyle Yorks",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1108/JWL-01-2018-0019",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "315--334",
journal = "The Journal of Workplace Learning",
issn = "1366-5626",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

How do employees' individual learning paths differ across occupations? A review of 10 years of empirical research. / Poell, R.F.; Lundgren, H.; Bang, April; Justice, Sean B.; Marsick, Victoria J.; Sung, SeoYoon; Yorks, Lyle.

In: The Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2018, p. 315-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do employees' individual learning paths differ across occupations?

T2 - A review of 10 years of empirical research

AU - Poell, R.F.

AU - Lundgren, H.

AU - Bang, April

AU - Justice, Sean B.

AU - Marsick, Victoria J.

AU - Sung, SeoYoon

AU - Yorks, Lyle

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Purpose: Employees are increasingly expected to organize their own human resource development activities. To what extent and how exactly employees in various organizational contexts manage to shape their individual learning paths however remains largely unclear. The purpose of this present study is to explore, leaning on the empirical Learning-Network Theory (LNT) research and its findings, how employees in different occupations create learning paths that are attuned to their specific work context.Design/methodology/approach:The paper reviews 23 MSc theses based on 14 distinct data sets collected between 2005 and 2015, containing approximately 1,484 employees from some 45 organizations and across various professions. The teachers, nurses, postal, software, telecom, railway and logistics company employees were mostly based in the Netherlands. The analysis focuses on learning-path types and learning-path strategies found in the 23 studies.Findings: Motives, themes, activities, social contexts and facilities were found to be instrumental in explaining differences among individual learning paths. A total of 34 original learning-path types and strategies were found to cluster under 12 higher-order labels. Some of these were based on learning motive, some on learning theme, some on core learning activities, some on social learning context and a few on a combination of these elements. Overall, the socially oriented learning-path strategy was the most prevalent, as it was found among nurses, employees of software/postal/telecom, railway and logistics company employees, as well as teachers in two schools.Originality/value: The paper presents the first overview of empirical studies on employee learning path(s) (strategies). In addition, it strengthens the empirical basis of the LNT.

AB - Purpose: Employees are increasingly expected to organize their own human resource development activities. To what extent and how exactly employees in various organizational contexts manage to shape their individual learning paths however remains largely unclear. The purpose of this present study is to explore, leaning on the empirical Learning-Network Theory (LNT) research and its findings, how employees in different occupations create learning paths that are attuned to their specific work context.Design/methodology/approach:The paper reviews 23 MSc theses based on 14 distinct data sets collected between 2005 and 2015, containing approximately 1,484 employees from some 45 organizations and across various professions. The teachers, nurses, postal, software, telecom, railway and logistics company employees were mostly based in the Netherlands. The analysis focuses on learning-path types and learning-path strategies found in the 23 studies.Findings: Motives, themes, activities, social contexts and facilities were found to be instrumental in explaining differences among individual learning paths. A total of 34 original learning-path types and strategies were found to cluster under 12 higher-order labels. Some of these were based on learning motive, some on learning theme, some on core learning activities, some on social learning context and a few on a combination of these elements. Overall, the socially oriented learning-path strategy was the most prevalent, as it was found among nurses, employees of software/postal/telecom, railway and logistics company employees, as well as teachers in two schools.Originality/value: The paper presents the first overview of empirical studies on employee learning path(s) (strategies). In addition, it strengthens the empirical basis of the LNT.

KW - Learning activities

KW - Learning-network theory

KW - Learning motives

KW - Learning path

KW - Learning-path strategies

KW - Learning-path types

KW - CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT

KW - HUMAN-RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

KW - NETWORK THEORY

KW - PROBLEMATIC PERSPECTIVES

KW - WORK

KW - TIME

U2 - 10.1108/JWL-01-2018-0019

DO - 10.1108/JWL-01-2018-0019

M3 - Review article

VL - 30

SP - 315

EP - 334

JO - The Journal of Workplace Learning

JF - The Journal of Workplace Learning

SN - 1366-5626

IS - 5

ER -