Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How epistemic uncertainty tolerance affects creative idea generation in design

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Creativity in collaborative design unfolds under conditions of unspecific and ambiguous information. While such epistemic uncertainty is inherent to many design projects, its impact on creativity is underexplored. This study investigated how epistemic uncertainty induced through problem briefings affects creativity during idea generation, and how tolerance for epistemic uncertainty moderates this relationship. A between-subjects experiment with 67 student participants collaborating in 18 groups tested idea generation under high versus low epistemic uncertainty conditions. The results showed a dual pathway effect: high epistemic uncertainty, compared to low epistemic uncertainty, increased idea originality, but decreased idea usefulness. Average group tolerance for uncertainty did not significantly moderate this relationship. Instead, a tolerant-anchor effect emerged: having at least one highly tolerant individual in a group supports idea usefulness under uncertain conditions. The findings contribute new insight into the complex ways in which epistemic uncertainty shapes creativity in collaborative design.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 11 Mar 2026
EventDesign Research Society Conference 2026 - University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 8 Jun 202612 Jun 2026
https://drs2026.thedrs.org/

Conference

ConferenceDesign Research Society Conference 2026
Abbreviated titleDRS2026
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period8/06/2612/06/26
Internet address

Keywords

  • Collaborative design
  • Epistemic uncertainty
  • Creativity
  • Idea generation
  • Uncertainty tolerance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How epistemic uncertainty tolerance affects creative idea generation in design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this