How heuristics handle uncertainty

Henry Brighton, Gerd Gigerenzer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Traditionally, it is assumed that a trade-off exists between effort and accuracy: The more effort we put in, the more accurate our inferences. This chapter shows how this trade-off does not hold in general, or even typically, by explaining how simple heuristics that ignore information can outperform more sophisticated inference strategies. Explanations of such “less-is-more” effects are given using statistical learning theory applied to situations where organisms face what is referred to as the bias–variance dilemma. Under conditions of uncertainty, it is argued, heuristics can both be more accurate and consume fewer resources than typical “rational” models of cognitive processing.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEcological Rationality
Subtitle of host publicationIntelligence in the World
EditorsPeter M Todd, Gerd Gigerenzer
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages33-60
Number of pages28
ISBN (Print)9780199682676
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameEcological Rationality: Intelligence in the World

Fingerprint

Heuristics
Inference
Uncertainty
Organism
Statistical Learning
Learning Theory
Resources
Cognitive Processing

Keywords

  • inference
  • bias–variance
  • dilemma
  • heuristics
  • unce

Cite this

Brighton, H., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). How heuristics handle uncertainty. In P. M. Todd, & G. Gigerenzer (Eds.), Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World (pp. 33-60). (Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315448.003.0014
Brighton, Henry ; Gigerenzer, Gerd. / How heuristics handle uncertainty. Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. editor / Peter M Todd ; Gerd Gigerenzer. Oxford University Press, 2012. pp. 33-60 (Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World).
@inbook{782128423f464a7a8271e2d07560c3f7,
title = "How heuristics handle uncertainty",
abstract = "Traditionally, it is assumed that a trade-off exists between effort and accuracy: The more effort we put in, the more accurate our inferences. This chapter shows how this trade-off does not hold in general, or even typically, by explaining how simple heuristics that ignore information can outperform more sophisticated inference strategies. Explanations of such “less-is-more” effects are given using statistical learning theory applied to situations where organisms face what is referred to as the bias–variance dilemma. Under conditions of uncertainty, it is argued, heuristics can both be more accurate and consume fewer resources than typical “rational” models of cognitive processing.",
keywords = "inference, bias–variance, dilemma, heuristics, unce",
author = "Henry Brighton and Gerd Gigerenzer",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315448.003.0014",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780199682676",
series = "Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
pages = "33--60",
editor = "Todd, {Peter M} and Gerd Gigerenzer",
booktitle = "Ecological Rationality",
address = "United States",

}

Brighton, H & Gigerenzer, G 2012, How heuristics handle uncertainty. in PM Todd & G Gigerenzer (eds), Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World, Oxford University Press, pp. 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315448.003.0014

How heuristics handle uncertainty. / Brighton, Henry; Gigerenzer, Gerd.

Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. ed. / Peter M Todd; Gerd Gigerenzer. Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 33-60 (Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - How heuristics handle uncertainty

AU - Brighton, Henry

AU - Gigerenzer, Gerd

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Traditionally, it is assumed that a trade-off exists between effort and accuracy: The more effort we put in, the more accurate our inferences. This chapter shows how this trade-off does not hold in general, or even typically, by explaining how simple heuristics that ignore information can outperform more sophisticated inference strategies. Explanations of such “less-is-more” effects are given using statistical learning theory applied to situations where organisms face what is referred to as the bias–variance dilemma. Under conditions of uncertainty, it is argued, heuristics can both be more accurate and consume fewer resources than typical “rational” models of cognitive processing.

AB - Traditionally, it is assumed that a trade-off exists between effort and accuracy: The more effort we put in, the more accurate our inferences. This chapter shows how this trade-off does not hold in general, or even typically, by explaining how simple heuristics that ignore information can outperform more sophisticated inference strategies. Explanations of such “less-is-more” effects are given using statistical learning theory applied to situations where organisms face what is referred to as the bias–variance dilemma. Under conditions of uncertainty, it is argued, heuristics can both be more accurate and consume fewer resources than typical “rational” models of cognitive processing.

KW - inference

KW - bias–variance

KW - dilemma

KW - heuristics

KW - unce

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315448.003.0014

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315448.003.0014

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780199682676

T3 - Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World

SP - 33

EP - 60

BT - Ecological Rationality

A2 - Todd, Peter M

A2 - Gigerenzer, Gerd

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Brighton H, Gigerenzer G. How heuristics handle uncertainty. In Todd PM, Gigerenzer G, editors, Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. Oxford University Press. 2012. p. 33-60. (Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315448.003.0014