How operations matters in healthcare standardization

Melissa De Regge, P. Gemmel, Bert Meijboom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose Process management approaches all pursue standardization, of which evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the most common form in healthcare. While EBM addresses improvement in clinical performance, it is unclear whether EBM also enhances operational performance. Conversely, operational process standardization (OPS) does not necessarily yield better clinical performance. The authors have therefore looked at the relationship between clinical practise standardization (CPS) and OPS and the way in which they jointly affect operational performance. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a comparative case study analysis of a cataract surgery treatment at five Belgium hospital sites. Data collection involved 218 h of observations of 274 cataract surgeries. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used. Findings Findings suggest that CPS does not automatically lead to improved resource or throughput efficiency. This can be explained by the low level of OPS across the five units, notwithstanding CPS. The results indicate that a wide range of variables on different levels (patient, physician and organization) affect OPS. Research limitations/implications - Considering one type of care treatment in which clinical outcome variations are small complicates translating the findings to unstructured and complex care treatments. Originality/value With the introduction of OPS as a complementary view of CPS, the study clearly shows the potential of OPS to support CPS in practice. Operations matters in healthcare standardization, but only when it is managed in a deliberate way on a hospital and policy level.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1144-1165
JournalInternational Journal of Operations and Production Management
Volume39
Issue number9/10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Standardization
Medicine
Healthcare
Surgery
Throughput

Keywords

  • process management
  • standardization
  • cataract surgery
  • healthcare sector
  • multilevel analysis

Cite this

@article{ef52df78b24447c49693affe7d307818,
title = "How operations matters in healthcare standardization",
abstract = "Purpose Process management approaches all pursue standardization, of which evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the most common form in healthcare. While EBM addresses improvement in clinical performance, it is unclear whether EBM also enhances operational performance. Conversely, operational process standardization (OPS) does not necessarily yield better clinical performance. The authors have therefore looked at the relationship between clinical practise standardization (CPS) and OPS and the way in which they jointly affect operational performance. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a comparative case study analysis of a cataract surgery treatment at five Belgium hospital sites. Data collection involved 218 h of observations of 274 cataract surgeries. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used. Findings Findings suggest that CPS does not automatically lead to improved resource or throughput efficiency. This can be explained by the low level of OPS across the five units, notwithstanding CPS. The results indicate that a wide range of variables on different levels (patient, physician and organization) affect OPS. Research limitations/implications - Considering one type of care treatment in which clinical outcome variations are small complicates translating the findings to unstructured and complex care treatments. Originality/value With the introduction of OPS as a complementary view of CPS, the study clearly shows the potential of OPS to support CPS in practice. Operations matters in healthcare standardization, but only when it is managed in a deliberate way on a hospital and policy level.",
keywords = "process management, standardization, cataract surgery, healthcare sector, multilevel analysis",
author = "{De Regge}, Melissa and P. Gemmel and Bert Meijboom",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1108/IJOPM-03-2019-0227",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1144--1165",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "9/10",

}

How operations matters in healthcare standardization. / De Regge, Melissa; Gemmel, P.; Meijboom, Bert.

In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 39, No. 9/10, 12.2019, p. 1144-1165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How operations matters in healthcare standardization

AU - De Regge, Melissa

AU - Gemmel, P.

AU - Meijboom, Bert

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Purpose Process management approaches all pursue standardization, of which evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the most common form in healthcare. While EBM addresses improvement in clinical performance, it is unclear whether EBM also enhances operational performance. Conversely, operational process standardization (OPS) does not necessarily yield better clinical performance. The authors have therefore looked at the relationship between clinical practise standardization (CPS) and OPS and the way in which they jointly affect operational performance. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a comparative case study analysis of a cataract surgery treatment at five Belgium hospital sites. Data collection involved 218 h of observations of 274 cataract surgeries. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used. Findings Findings suggest that CPS does not automatically lead to improved resource or throughput efficiency. This can be explained by the low level of OPS across the five units, notwithstanding CPS. The results indicate that a wide range of variables on different levels (patient, physician and organization) affect OPS. Research limitations/implications - Considering one type of care treatment in which clinical outcome variations are small complicates translating the findings to unstructured and complex care treatments. Originality/value With the introduction of OPS as a complementary view of CPS, the study clearly shows the potential of OPS to support CPS in practice. Operations matters in healthcare standardization, but only when it is managed in a deliberate way on a hospital and policy level.

AB - Purpose Process management approaches all pursue standardization, of which evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the most common form in healthcare. While EBM addresses improvement in clinical performance, it is unclear whether EBM also enhances operational performance. Conversely, operational process standardization (OPS) does not necessarily yield better clinical performance. The authors have therefore looked at the relationship between clinical practise standardization (CPS) and OPS and the way in which they jointly affect operational performance. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a comparative case study analysis of a cataract surgery treatment at five Belgium hospital sites. Data collection involved 218 h of observations of 274 cataract surgeries. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used. Findings Findings suggest that CPS does not automatically lead to improved resource or throughput efficiency. This can be explained by the low level of OPS across the five units, notwithstanding CPS. The results indicate that a wide range of variables on different levels (patient, physician and organization) affect OPS. Research limitations/implications - Considering one type of care treatment in which clinical outcome variations are small complicates translating the findings to unstructured and complex care treatments. Originality/value With the introduction of OPS as a complementary view of CPS, the study clearly shows the potential of OPS to support CPS in practice. Operations matters in healthcare standardization, but only when it is managed in a deliberate way on a hospital and policy level.

KW - process management

KW - standardization

KW - cataract surgery

KW - healthcare sector

KW - multilevel analysis

U2 - 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2019-0227

DO - 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2019-0227

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1144

EP - 1165

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 9/10

ER -