How to improve integrated care for people with chronic conditions: Key findings from EU FP-7 project INTEGRATE and beyond

L. Borgermans, Y. Marchal, L. Busetto, J. Kalseth, F. Kasteng, K. Suija, M. Oona, O. Tigova, M. Rösenmuller, D. Devroey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many survey studies in health care adjust for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, educational attainment and general health when performing statistical analyses. Whether the effects of these demographic characteristics are consistent between patient groups remains to be determined. This is important as the rationale for adjustment is often that demographic sub-groups differ in their so-called 'response tendency'. This rationale may be less convincing if the effects of response tendencies vary across patient groups. The present paper examines whether the impact of these characteristics on patients' global rating of care varies across patient groups.
Secondary analyses using multi-level regression models were performed on a dataset including 32 different patient groups and 145,578 observations. For each demographic variable, the 95% expected range of case-mix coefficients across patient groups is presented. In addition, we report whether the variance of coefficients for demographic variables across patient groups is significant.
Overall, men, elderly, lower educated people and people in good health tend to give higher global ratings. However, these effects varied significantly across patient groups and included the possibility of no effect or an opposite effect in some patient groups.
The response tendency attributed to demographic characteristics - such as older respondents being milder, or higher educated respondents being more critical - is not general or universal. As such, the mechanism linking demographic characteristics to survey results on patient experiences with quality of care is more complicated than a general response tendency. It is possible that the response tendency interacts with patient group, but it is also possible that other mechanisms are at play.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7
JournalInternational Journal of Integrated Care
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

EU
Group
rating
health
health care
regression
Delivery of Health Care
gender
Surveys and Questionnaires
experience

Cite this

Borgermans, L. ; Marchal, Y. ; Busetto, L. ; Kalseth, J. ; Kasteng, F. ; Suija, K. ; Oona, M. ; Tigova, O. ; Rösenmuller, M. ; Devroey, D. / How to improve integrated care for people with chronic conditions : Key findings from EU FP-7 project INTEGRATE and beyond. In: International Journal of Integrated Care. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 4.
@article{46a96c96d5e043b69503d6d3e5f6a36d,
title = "How to improve integrated care for people with chronic conditions: Key findings from EU FP-7 project INTEGRATE and beyond",
abstract = "Many survey studies in health care adjust for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, educational attainment and general health when performing statistical analyses. Whether the effects of these demographic characteristics are consistent between patient groups remains to be determined. This is important as the rationale for adjustment is often that demographic sub-groups differ in their so-called 'response tendency'. This rationale may be less convincing if the effects of response tendencies vary across patient groups. The present paper examines whether the impact of these characteristics on patients' global rating of care varies across patient groups.Secondary analyses using multi-level regression models were performed on a dataset including 32 different patient groups and 145,578 observations. For each demographic variable, the 95{\%} expected range of case-mix coefficients across patient groups is presented. In addition, we report whether the variance of coefficients for demographic variables across patient groups is significant.Overall, men, elderly, lower educated people and people in good health tend to give higher global ratings. However, these effects varied significantly across patient groups and included the possibility of no effect or an opposite effect in some patient groups.The response tendency attributed to demographic characteristics - such as older respondents being milder, or higher educated respondents being more critical - is not general or universal. As such, the mechanism linking demographic characteristics to survey results on patient experiences with quality of care is more complicated than a general response tendency. It is possible that the response tendency interacts with patient group, but it is also possible that other mechanisms are at play.",
author = "L. Borgermans and Y. Marchal and L. Busetto and J. Kalseth and F. Kasteng and K. Suija and M. Oona and O. Tigova and M. R{\"o}senmuller and D. Devroey",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.5334/ijic.3096",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "International Journal of Integrated Care",
issn = "1568-4156",
publisher = "IGITUR, UTRECHT PUBLISHING & ARCHIVING SERVICES",
number = "4",

}

Borgermans, L, Marchal, Y, Busetto, L, Kalseth, J, Kasteng, F, Suija, K, Oona, M, Tigova, O, Rösenmuller, M & Devroey, D 2017, 'How to improve integrated care for people with chronic conditions: Key findings from EU FP-7 project INTEGRATE and beyond', International Journal of Integrated Care, vol. 17, no. 4, 7. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3096

How to improve integrated care for people with chronic conditions : Key findings from EU FP-7 project INTEGRATE and beyond. / Borgermans, L.; Marchal, Y.; Busetto, L.; Kalseth, J.; Kasteng, F.; Suija, K.; Oona, M.; Tigova, O.; Rösenmuller, M.; Devroey, D.

In: International Journal of Integrated Care, Vol. 17, No. 4, 7, 09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to improve integrated care for people with chronic conditions

T2 - Key findings from EU FP-7 project INTEGRATE and beyond

AU - Borgermans, L.

AU - Marchal, Y.

AU - Busetto, L.

AU - Kalseth, J.

AU - Kasteng, F.

AU - Suija, K.

AU - Oona, M.

AU - Tigova, O.

AU - Rösenmuller, M.

AU - Devroey, D.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Many survey studies in health care adjust for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, educational attainment and general health when performing statistical analyses. Whether the effects of these demographic characteristics are consistent between patient groups remains to be determined. This is important as the rationale for adjustment is often that demographic sub-groups differ in their so-called 'response tendency'. This rationale may be less convincing if the effects of response tendencies vary across patient groups. The present paper examines whether the impact of these characteristics on patients' global rating of care varies across patient groups.Secondary analyses using multi-level regression models were performed on a dataset including 32 different patient groups and 145,578 observations. For each demographic variable, the 95% expected range of case-mix coefficients across patient groups is presented. In addition, we report whether the variance of coefficients for demographic variables across patient groups is significant.Overall, men, elderly, lower educated people and people in good health tend to give higher global ratings. However, these effects varied significantly across patient groups and included the possibility of no effect or an opposite effect in some patient groups.The response tendency attributed to demographic characteristics - such as older respondents being milder, or higher educated respondents being more critical - is not general or universal. As such, the mechanism linking demographic characteristics to survey results on patient experiences with quality of care is more complicated than a general response tendency. It is possible that the response tendency interacts with patient group, but it is also possible that other mechanisms are at play.

AB - Many survey studies in health care adjust for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, educational attainment and general health when performing statistical analyses. Whether the effects of these demographic characteristics are consistent between patient groups remains to be determined. This is important as the rationale for adjustment is often that demographic sub-groups differ in their so-called 'response tendency'. This rationale may be less convincing if the effects of response tendencies vary across patient groups. The present paper examines whether the impact of these characteristics on patients' global rating of care varies across patient groups.Secondary analyses using multi-level regression models were performed on a dataset including 32 different patient groups and 145,578 observations. For each demographic variable, the 95% expected range of case-mix coefficients across patient groups is presented. In addition, we report whether the variance of coefficients for demographic variables across patient groups is significant.Overall, men, elderly, lower educated people and people in good health tend to give higher global ratings. However, these effects varied significantly across patient groups and included the possibility of no effect or an opposite effect in some patient groups.The response tendency attributed to demographic characteristics - such as older respondents being milder, or higher educated respondents being more critical - is not general or universal. As such, the mechanism linking demographic characteristics to survey results on patient experiences with quality of care is more complicated than a general response tendency. It is possible that the response tendency interacts with patient group, but it is also possible that other mechanisms are at play.

U2 - 10.5334/ijic.3096

DO - 10.5334/ijic.3096

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - International Journal of Integrated Care

JF - International Journal of Integrated Care

SN - 1568-4156

IS - 4

M1 - 7

ER -