Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“I am struggling to find an explicit task”: a midterm evaluation of patient research partner involvement in HIPPOCRATES translational research

  • Maarten de Wit*
  • , Oliver FitzGerald
  • , Anne Barton
  • , Heidi Bertheussen
  • , Laura C. Coates
  • , Owen Davies
  • , Christine Huppertz
  • , David Trigos
  • , Michaela Köhm
  • , Sina Mackay
  • , Denis O´Sullivan
  • , Stefan Siebert
  • , Wendy Wagenaar
  • , Stephen R. Pennington
  • , Diana Rodrigues
  • , Katie I. Gallacher
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives
The HIPPOCRATES project is a 5-year, international research partnership dedicated to studying and treating psoriatic disease. Integrating Patient Research Partners (PRPs) into large scientific groups, particularly those heavily focused on preclinical or laboratory-based science, is challenging. This paper details a midterm evaluation of how effectively PRPs have been engaged in the HIPPOCRATES project.

Methods
Our evaluation used a mixed-method approach comprising 7 dedicated reflective PRP meetings, 2 midterm surveys among PRPs and researchers, a modified World Café discussion, and 5 structured dialogue meetings. We used descriptive statistics and pragmatic constant comparative analysis.

Results
Substantial PRP input occurred early during the project’s presubmission phase, which resulted in a formal strategy for patient involvement. However, 3 years after approval, significant differences emerged between researcher and PRP perspectives. Compared with researchers, PRPs reported more challenges, had differing expectations, and perceived a lower overall impact. Although PRPs were highly motivated at the start and contributed significantly to clinical components, motivation decreased for some regarding the laboratory components. This was attributed to highly technical language, long contract negotiations, and a lack of clear opportunities for input or tangible results. Consortium members collaboratively agreed upon a set of specific changes during the 5 dialogue sessions.

Conclusions
Despite the early and substantial involvement of PRPs in the initial study design, the PRPs themselves rated their influence on HIPPOCRATES lower than the researchers did. Further evaluation over the next 2 years will show whether the jointly developed solutions successfully enhance their impact on future research outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100157
Number of pages8
JournalEULAR Rheumatology Open
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Mar 2026
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“I am struggling to find an explicit task”: a midterm evaluation of patient research partner involvement in HIPPOCRATES translational research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this