TY - JOUR
T1 - If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice
AU - Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J.
AU - Navarro, Isidora
AU - Ortúzar, Juan de Dios
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to thank Ricardo Hurtubia for his useful suggestions and for pointing out the convenience of changing the name of the paper, suggesting we should choose a path that's clear, we should choose freewill. We are also grateful to Juan Pablo Sep?lveda for having provided us with the real data used in our first experiment. Finally, we are indebted to the Institute on Complex Engineering Systems (ICM: P-05-004-F; CONICYT: FB0816), the Centre for Sustainable Urban Development, CEDEUS (Conicyt/Fondap/15110020) and the Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence funded by VREF (www.brt.cl), for their support. This article benefited greatly from the helpful comments of two anonymous referees.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - When designing stated-choice experiments modellers may consider offering respondents an “indifference” alternative to avoid stochastic choices when utility differences between alternatives are perceived as too small. By doing this, the modeller avoids adding white noise to the data and may gain additional information. This paper proposes a framework to model discrete choices in the presence of indifference alternatives. The approach allows depicting the likelihood function, independent of the number of alternatives in the choice-set and in the subset of indifference alternatives, offering a new approach to existing methods that are only defined for binary choice situations. The method is tested with the help of simulated and real data observing that the proposed framework allows recovering the parameters used in the generation of the synthetic datasets without major difficulties in most cases. Alternative approaches, such as considering the indifference option as an opt-out alternative or ignoring the indifference choices are clearly outperformed by the proposed framework and appear not capable of recovering parameters in the simulated set.
AB - When designing stated-choice experiments modellers may consider offering respondents an “indifference” alternative to avoid stochastic choices when utility differences between alternatives are perceived as too small. By doing this, the modeller avoids adding white noise to the data and may gain additional information. This paper proposes a framework to model discrete choices in the presence of indifference alternatives. The approach allows depicting the likelihood function, independent of the number of alternatives in the choice-set and in the subset of indifference alternatives, offering a new approach to existing methods that are only defined for binary choice situations. The method is tested with the help of simulated and real data observing that the proposed framework allows recovering the parameters used in the generation of the synthetic datasets without major difficulties in most cases. Alternative approaches, such as considering the indifference option as an opt-out alternative or ignoring the indifference choices are clearly outperformed by the proposed framework and appear not capable of recovering parameters in the simulated set.
KW - Discrete choice models
KW - Indifference
KW - Stated-choice experiments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002525331&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jocm.2016.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jocm.2016.11.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85002525331
SN - 1755-5345
VL - 22
SP - 13
EP - 23
JO - Journal of Choice Modelling
JF - Journal of Choice Modelling
ER -