Immersive training

Breaking the bubble and measuring the heat

J.R. Pluyter, A.F. Rutkowski, J.J. Jakimowicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Minimal access surgery and, lately, single-incision laparoscopic procedures are challenging and demanding with regard to the skills of the surgeon performing the procedures. This article presents the results of an investigation of the performance and attention focus of 21 medical interns and surgical residents training in an immersive context. That is, training ‘in situation’, representing more realistically the demands imposed on the surgeons during minimal access surgery.

Methods
Twenty-one medical interns and surgical residents participated in simulation trainings in an integrated operating room for laparoscopic surgery. Various physiological measures of body heat expenditure were gathered as indicators of mental strain and attention focus.

Results
The results of the Mann–Whitney test indicated that participants with a poor performance in the two laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases had a significantly (U = 3, p = 0.038) higher heat flux at the start of the procedure (mean 107.08, standard deviation [SD] 24.34) than those who excelled in the two cases (mean 62.64, SD 23.41). Also, the average frontal head temperature of the participants who failed at the task was significantly lower (mean 33.27, SD 0.52) than those who performed well (mean 33.92, SD 0.27).

Conclusions
Surgeons cannot operate in a bubble; thus, they should not be trained in one. Combining heat flux and frontal head temperature could be a good measure of deep involvement and attentional focus during performance of simulated surgical tasks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1545-1554
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume28
Issue number5
Early online date8 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Operating Rooms

Keywords

  • attention focus
  • cognitive absorption
  • immersive training
  • simulation training
  • mental strain

Cite this

Pluyter, J.R. ; Rutkowski, A.F. ; Jakimowicz, J.J. / Immersive training : Breaking the bubble and measuring the heat. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 1545-1554.
@article{7e86ca1f9eea4b258d720105b176f4fb,
title = "Immersive training: Breaking the bubble and measuring the heat",
abstract = "BackgroundMinimal access surgery and, lately, single-incision laparoscopic procedures are challenging and demanding with regard to the skills of the surgeon performing the procedures. This article presents the results of an investigation of the performance and attention focus of 21 medical interns and surgical residents training in an immersive context. That is, training ‘in situation’, representing more realistically the demands imposed on the surgeons during minimal access surgery.MethodsTwenty-one medical interns and surgical residents participated in simulation trainings in an integrated operating room for laparoscopic surgery. Various physiological measures of body heat expenditure were gathered as indicators of mental strain and attention focus.ResultsThe results of the Mann–Whitney test indicated that participants with a poor performance in the two laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases had a significantly (U = 3, p = 0.038) higher heat flux at the start of the procedure (mean 107.08, standard deviation [SD] 24.34) than those who excelled in the two cases (mean 62.64, SD 23.41). Also, the average frontal head temperature of the participants who failed at the task was significantly lower (mean 33.27, SD 0.52) than those who performed well (mean 33.92, SD 0.27).ConclusionsSurgeons cannot operate in a bubble; thus, they should not be trained in one. Combining heat flux and frontal head temperature could be a good measure of deep involvement and attentional focus during performance of simulated surgical tasks.",
keywords = "attention focus, cognitive absorption, immersive training, simulation training, mental strain",
author = "J.R. Pluyter and A.F. Rutkowski and J.J. Jakimowicz",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007{\%}2fs00464-013-3350-4",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1545--1554",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

Immersive training : Breaking the bubble and measuring the heat. / Pluyter, J.R.; Rutkowski, A.F.; Jakimowicz, J.J.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 28, No. 5, 05.2014, p. 1545-1554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immersive training

T2 - Breaking the bubble and measuring the heat

AU - Pluyter, J.R.

AU - Rutkowski, A.F.

AU - Jakimowicz, J.J.

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - BackgroundMinimal access surgery and, lately, single-incision laparoscopic procedures are challenging and demanding with regard to the skills of the surgeon performing the procedures. This article presents the results of an investigation of the performance and attention focus of 21 medical interns and surgical residents training in an immersive context. That is, training ‘in situation’, representing more realistically the demands imposed on the surgeons during minimal access surgery.MethodsTwenty-one medical interns and surgical residents participated in simulation trainings in an integrated operating room for laparoscopic surgery. Various physiological measures of body heat expenditure were gathered as indicators of mental strain and attention focus.ResultsThe results of the Mann–Whitney test indicated that participants with a poor performance in the two laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases had a significantly (U = 3, p = 0.038) higher heat flux at the start of the procedure (mean 107.08, standard deviation [SD] 24.34) than those who excelled in the two cases (mean 62.64, SD 23.41). Also, the average frontal head temperature of the participants who failed at the task was significantly lower (mean 33.27, SD 0.52) than those who performed well (mean 33.92, SD 0.27).ConclusionsSurgeons cannot operate in a bubble; thus, they should not be trained in one. Combining heat flux and frontal head temperature could be a good measure of deep involvement and attentional focus during performance of simulated surgical tasks.

AB - BackgroundMinimal access surgery and, lately, single-incision laparoscopic procedures are challenging and demanding with regard to the skills of the surgeon performing the procedures. This article presents the results of an investigation of the performance and attention focus of 21 medical interns and surgical residents training in an immersive context. That is, training ‘in situation’, representing more realistically the demands imposed on the surgeons during minimal access surgery.MethodsTwenty-one medical interns and surgical residents participated in simulation trainings in an integrated operating room for laparoscopic surgery. Various physiological measures of body heat expenditure were gathered as indicators of mental strain and attention focus.ResultsThe results of the Mann–Whitney test indicated that participants with a poor performance in the two laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases had a significantly (U = 3, p = 0.038) higher heat flux at the start of the procedure (mean 107.08, standard deviation [SD] 24.34) than those who excelled in the two cases (mean 62.64, SD 23.41). Also, the average frontal head temperature of the participants who failed at the task was significantly lower (mean 33.27, SD 0.52) than those who performed well (mean 33.92, SD 0.27).ConclusionsSurgeons cannot operate in a bubble; thus, they should not be trained in one. Combining heat flux and frontal head temperature could be a good measure of deep involvement and attentional focus during performance of simulated surgical tasks.

KW - attention focus

KW - cognitive absorption

KW - immersive training

KW - simulation training

KW - mental strain

U2 - 10.1007%2fs00464-013-3350-4

DO - 10.1007%2fs00464-013-3350-4

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1545

EP - 1554

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 5

ER -