Implicit action tendencies and evaluations in unwanted snacking behaviour

J. Maas, G.P.J. Keijsers, M. Rinck, J. Sharbanee, M.S. Vroling, E.S. Backer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The present study investigated automatic/implicit and controlled/explicit processes in snacking behavior. Participants who were bothered by their habit of eating snacks were compared to participants with another habit. A reaction time task was used to assess implicit action tendencies in which participants had to pull or push a joystick in reaction to food and neutral stimuli on the screen. With regard to appetitive action tendencies, compared to the controls, participants who were bothered by snack eating were slower to push food stimuli. On a semantic priming task to assess implicit evaluations, they exhibited less interference between positive self-control targets and food stimuli, suggesting a weaker association between self-control and food. No group differences were found in food-taste associations or explicit taste ratings. Results suggest that snacking behavior seems to be due to both implicit appetitive action tendencies and weak associations with self-control. However, they also indicate that explicit tastiness evaluations of food do not seem to affect snacking behavior.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-91
JournalInternational Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Habits
Self-Control

Cite this

Maas, J., Keijsers, G. P. J., Rinck, M., Sharbanee, J., Vroling, M. S., & Backer, E. S. (2017). Implicit action tendencies and evaluations in unwanted snacking behaviour. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 10(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/0.1521/ijct.2017.10.1.79
Maas, J. ; Keijsers, G.P.J. ; Rinck, M. ; Sharbanee, J. ; Vroling, M.S. ; Backer, E.S. / Implicit action tendencies and evaluations in unwanted snacking behaviour. In: International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 79-91.
@article{75dd521645994ddebd7b6671113a4d3e,
title = "Implicit action tendencies and evaluations in unwanted snacking behaviour",
abstract = "The present study investigated automatic/implicit and controlled/explicit processes in snacking behavior. Participants who were bothered by their habit of eating snacks were compared to participants with another habit. A reaction time task was used to assess implicit action tendencies in which participants had to pull or push a joystick in reaction to food and neutral stimuli on the screen. With regard to appetitive action tendencies, compared to the controls, participants who were bothered by snack eating were slower to push food stimuli. On a semantic priming task to assess implicit evaluations, they exhibited less interference between positive self-control targets and food stimuli, suggesting a weaker association between self-control and food. No group differences were found in food-taste associations or explicit taste ratings. Results suggest that snacking behavior seems to be due to both implicit appetitive action tendencies and weak associations with self-control. However, they also indicate that explicit tastiness evaluations of food do not seem to affect snacking behavior.",
author = "J. Maas and G.P.J. Keijsers and M. Rinck and J. Sharbanee and M.S. Vroling and E.S. Backer",
year = "2017",
doi = "0.1521/ijct.2017.10.1.79",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "79--91",
journal = "International Journal of Cognitive Therapy",
issn = "1937-1209",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "1",

}

Maas, J, Keijsers, GPJ, Rinck, M, Sharbanee, J, Vroling, MS & Backer, ES 2017, 'Implicit action tendencies and evaluations in unwanted snacking behaviour', International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 79-91. https://doi.org/0.1521/ijct.2017.10.1.79

Implicit action tendencies and evaluations in unwanted snacking behaviour. / Maas, J.; Keijsers, G.P.J.; Rinck, M.; Sharbanee, J.; Vroling, M.S.; Backer, E.S.

In: International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017, p. 79-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit action tendencies and evaluations in unwanted snacking behaviour

AU - Maas, J.

AU - Keijsers, G.P.J.

AU - Rinck, M.

AU - Sharbanee, J.

AU - Vroling, M.S.

AU - Backer, E.S.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The present study investigated automatic/implicit and controlled/explicit processes in snacking behavior. Participants who were bothered by their habit of eating snacks were compared to participants with another habit. A reaction time task was used to assess implicit action tendencies in which participants had to pull or push a joystick in reaction to food and neutral stimuli on the screen. With regard to appetitive action tendencies, compared to the controls, participants who were bothered by snack eating were slower to push food stimuli. On a semantic priming task to assess implicit evaluations, they exhibited less interference between positive self-control targets and food stimuli, suggesting a weaker association between self-control and food. No group differences were found in food-taste associations or explicit taste ratings. Results suggest that snacking behavior seems to be due to both implicit appetitive action tendencies and weak associations with self-control. However, they also indicate that explicit tastiness evaluations of food do not seem to affect snacking behavior.

AB - The present study investigated automatic/implicit and controlled/explicit processes in snacking behavior. Participants who were bothered by their habit of eating snacks were compared to participants with another habit. A reaction time task was used to assess implicit action tendencies in which participants had to pull or push a joystick in reaction to food and neutral stimuli on the screen. With regard to appetitive action tendencies, compared to the controls, participants who were bothered by snack eating were slower to push food stimuli. On a semantic priming task to assess implicit evaluations, they exhibited less interference between positive self-control targets and food stimuli, suggesting a weaker association between self-control and food. No group differences were found in food-taste associations or explicit taste ratings. Results suggest that snacking behavior seems to be due to both implicit appetitive action tendencies and weak associations with self-control. However, they also indicate that explicit tastiness evaluations of food do not seem to affect snacking behavior.

U2 - 0.1521/ijct.2017.10.1.79

DO - 0.1521/ijct.2017.10.1.79

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 79

EP - 91

JO - International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

JF - International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

SN - 1937-1209

IS - 1

ER -