Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology

K. Sijtsma, C.L.S. Veldkamp, J.M. Wicherts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We respond to the commentaries Waldman and Lilienfeld (Psychometrika, 2015) and Wigboldus and Dotch (Psychometrika, 2015) provided in response to Sijtsma’s (Sijtsma in Psychometrika, 2015) discussion article on questionable research practices. Specifically, we discuss the fear of an increased dichotomy between substantive and statistical aspects of research that may arise when the latter aspects are laid entirely in the hands of a statistician, remedies for false positives and replication failure, and the status of data exploration, and we provide a re-definition of the concept of questionable research practices.
Keywords: data exploration, questionable research practices, remedies for false positives, replication failure
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-38
JournalPsychometrika
Volume81
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

False Positive
Replication
Statistical Analysis
Statistical methods
Dichotomy
Psychology
Concepts

Cite this

Sijtsma, K. ; Veldkamp, C.L.S. ; Wicherts, J.M. / Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology. In: Psychometrika. 2016 ; Vol. 81, No. 1. pp. 33-38.
@article{daaba1840ea4409784a2aeaa62fa7527,
title = "Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology",
abstract = "We respond to the commentaries Waldman and Lilienfeld (Psychometrika, 2015) and Wigboldus and Dotch (Psychometrika, 2015) provided in response to Sijtsma’s (Sijtsma in Psychometrika, 2015) discussion article on questionable research practices. Specifically, we discuss the fear of an increased dichotomy between substantive and statistical aspects of research that may arise when the latter aspects are laid entirely in the hands of a statistician, remedies for false positives and replication failure, and the status of data exploration, and we provide a re-definition of the concept of questionable research practices.Keywords: data exploration, questionable research practices, remedies for false positives, replication failure",
author = "K. Sijtsma and C.L.S. Veldkamp and J.M. Wicherts",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s11336-015-9444-2",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "33--38",
journal = "Psychometrika",
issn = "0033-3123",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology. / Sijtsma, K.; Veldkamp, C.L.S.; Wicherts, J.M.

In: Psychometrika, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2016, p. 33-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology

AU - Sijtsma, K.

AU - Veldkamp, C.L.S.

AU - Wicherts, J.M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We respond to the commentaries Waldman and Lilienfeld (Psychometrika, 2015) and Wigboldus and Dotch (Psychometrika, 2015) provided in response to Sijtsma’s (Sijtsma in Psychometrika, 2015) discussion article on questionable research practices. Specifically, we discuss the fear of an increased dichotomy between substantive and statistical aspects of research that may arise when the latter aspects are laid entirely in the hands of a statistician, remedies for false positives and replication failure, and the status of data exploration, and we provide a re-definition of the concept of questionable research practices.Keywords: data exploration, questionable research practices, remedies for false positives, replication failure

AB - We respond to the commentaries Waldman and Lilienfeld (Psychometrika, 2015) and Wigboldus and Dotch (Psychometrika, 2015) provided in response to Sijtsma’s (Sijtsma in Psychometrika, 2015) discussion article on questionable research practices. Specifically, we discuss the fear of an increased dichotomy between substantive and statistical aspects of research that may arise when the latter aspects are laid entirely in the hands of a statistician, remedies for false positives and replication failure, and the status of data exploration, and we provide a re-definition of the concept of questionable research practices.Keywords: data exploration, questionable research practices, remedies for false positives, replication failure

U2 - 10.1007/s11336-015-9444-2

DO - 10.1007/s11336-015-9444-2

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 33

EP - 38

JO - Psychometrika

JF - Psychometrika

SN - 0033-3123

IS - 1

ER -