Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology

K. Sijtsma, C.L.S. Veldkamp, J.M. Wicherts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We respond to the commentaries Waldman and Lilienfeld (Psychometrika, 2015) and Wigboldus and Dotch (Psychometrika, 2015) provided in response to Sijtsma’s (Sijtsma in Psychometrika, 2015) discussion article on questionable research practices. Specifically, we discuss the fear of an increased dichotomy between substantive and statistical aspects of research that may arise when the latter aspects are laid entirely in the hands of a statistician, remedies for false positives and replication failure, and the status of data exploration, and we provide a re-definition of the concept of questionable research practices.
Keywords: data exploration, questionable research practices, remedies for false positives, replication failure
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-38
JournalPsychometrika
Volume81
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

Cite this