TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Clinical Practice
T2 - Tackling Current Challenges With Innovative Digital Communication Technologies
AU - de Ligt, Kelly
AU - Hommes, Saar
AU - Vromans, Ruben
AU - Boomstra, Eva
AU - van de Poll, Lonneke
AU - Krahmer, Emiel
N1 - ©Kelly M de Ligt, Saar Hommes, Ruben D Vromans, Eva Boomstra, Lonneke V van de Poll, Emiel J Krahmer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 05.02.2025.
PY - 2025/2/5
Y1 - 2025/2/5
N2 - Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice is challenging. We believe effective communication is key to realizing the clinical benefits of PROMs. Communication processes for PROMs in clinical practice typically involve (1) health care professionals (HCPs) inviting patients to complete PROMs, (2) patients completing PROMs, (3) HCPs and patients interpreting the resulting patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and (4) HCPs and patients using PROs for health management. Yet, communication around PROMs remains underexplored. Importantly, patients differ in their skills, knowledge, preferences, and motivations for completing PROMs, as well as in their ability and willingness to interpret and apply PROs in managing their health. Despite this, current communication practices often fail to account for these differences. This paper highlights the importance of personalized communication to make PROMs accessible to diverse populations. Personalizing communication manually is highly labor-intensive, but several digital technologies can offer a feasible solution to accommodate various patients. Despite their potential, these technologies have not yet been applied to PROMs. We explore how existing principles and tools, such as automatic data-to-text generation (including multimodal outputs like text combined with data visualizations) and conversational agents, can enable personalized communication of PROMs in practice.
AB - Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice is challenging. We believe effective communication is key to realizing the clinical benefits of PROMs. Communication processes for PROMs in clinical practice typically involve (1) health care professionals (HCPs) inviting patients to complete PROMs, (2) patients completing PROMs, (3) HCPs and patients interpreting the resulting patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and (4) HCPs and patients using PROs for health management. Yet, communication around PROMs remains underexplored. Importantly, patients differ in their skills, knowledge, preferences, and motivations for completing PROMs, as well as in their ability and willingness to interpret and apply PROs in managing their health. Despite this, current communication practices often fail to account for these differences. This paper highlights the importance of personalized communication to make PROMs accessible to diverse populations. Personalizing communication manually is highly labor-intensive, but several digital technologies can offer a feasible solution to accommodate various patients. Despite their potential, these technologies have not yet been applied to PROMs. We explore how existing principles and tools, such as automatic data-to-text generation (including multimodal outputs like text combined with data visualizations) and conversational agents, can enable personalized communication of PROMs in practice.
KW - patient reported outcome measures
KW - quality of life
KW - health communication
KW - delivery of health care
KW - digital sciences
KW - Clinical practice
KW - patient reported outcomes
KW - digital communication
KW - communication
KW - health management
KW - digital technologies
U2 - 10.2196/60777
DO - 10.2196/60777
M3 - Article
C2 - 39908539
SN - 1438-8871
VL - 27
SP - e60777
JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research
JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research
M1 - e60777
ER -