Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock

Christoph Koenig, David Schindler

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Do firearm purchase delay laws reduce aggregate homicide levels? Using quasi-experimental evidence from a 6-month countrywide gun demand shock starting in late 2012, we show that U.S. states with legislation preventing immediate handgun purchases experienced smaller increases in handgun sales. Our findings are hard to reconcile with entirely rational consumers, but suggest that gun buyers behave time-inconsistently. In a second step, we demonstrate that states with purchase delays also witnessed 3% lower homicide rates during the same period compared to states allowing instant handgun access. We report suggestive evidence that lower handgun sales primarily reduced impulsive assaults and domestic violence.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherCentER, Center for Economic Research
Number of pages89
Volume2018-043
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2018

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2018-043

Fingerprint

Demand shocks
Ownership
Impulse
Firearms
Purchase
Homicide
U.S. States
Legislation
Buyers
Domestic violence

Keywords

  • guns
  • murder
  • Sandy Hook
  • gun control
  • impulsiveness

Cite this

Koenig, C., & Schindler, D. (2018). Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2018-043). Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research.
Koenig, Christoph ; Schindler, David. / Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides : Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock. Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2018. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{a9c101a685e74e4e93ffa2822e71dc03,
title = "Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock",
abstract = "Do firearm purchase delay laws reduce aggregate homicide levels? Using quasi-experimental evidence from a 6-month countrywide gun demand shock starting in late 2012, we show that U.S. states with legislation preventing immediate handgun purchases experienced smaller increases in handgun sales. Our findings are hard to reconcile with entirely rational consumers, but suggest that gun buyers behave time-inconsistently. In a second step, we demonstrate that states with purchase delays also witnessed 3{\%} lower homicide rates during the same period compared to states allowing instant handgun access. We report suggestive evidence that lower handgun sales primarily reduced impulsive assaults and domestic violence.",
keywords = "guns, murder, Sandy Hook, gun control, impulsiveness",
author = "Christoph Koenig and David Schindler",
note = "CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2018-043",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "24",
language = "English",
volume = "2018-043",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",

}

Koenig, C & Schindler, D 2018 'Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2018-043, CentER, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg.

Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides : Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock. / Koenig, Christoph; Schindler, David.

Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2018. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2018-043).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides

T2 - Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock

AU - Koenig, Christoph

AU - Schindler, David

N1 - CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2018-043

PY - 2018/10/24

Y1 - 2018/10/24

N2 - Do firearm purchase delay laws reduce aggregate homicide levels? Using quasi-experimental evidence from a 6-month countrywide gun demand shock starting in late 2012, we show that U.S. states with legislation preventing immediate handgun purchases experienced smaller increases in handgun sales. Our findings are hard to reconcile with entirely rational consumers, but suggest that gun buyers behave time-inconsistently. In a second step, we demonstrate that states with purchase delays also witnessed 3% lower homicide rates during the same period compared to states allowing instant handgun access. We report suggestive evidence that lower handgun sales primarily reduced impulsive assaults and domestic violence.

AB - Do firearm purchase delay laws reduce aggregate homicide levels? Using quasi-experimental evidence from a 6-month countrywide gun demand shock starting in late 2012, we show that U.S. states with legislation preventing immediate handgun purchases experienced smaller increases in handgun sales. Our findings are hard to reconcile with entirely rational consumers, but suggest that gun buyers behave time-inconsistently. In a second step, we demonstrate that states with purchase delays also witnessed 3% lower homicide rates during the same period compared to states allowing instant handgun access. We report suggestive evidence that lower handgun sales primarily reduced impulsive assaults and domestic violence.

KW - guns

KW - murder

KW - Sandy Hook

KW - gun control

KW - impulsiveness

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2018-043

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides

PB - CentER, Center for Economic Research

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Koenig C, Schindler D. Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock. Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research. 2018 Oct 24. (CentER Discussion Paper).