In defense of a "grammar" in the visual language of comics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Visual Language Theory (VLT) argues that the structure of drawn images is guided by similar cognitive principles as language, foremost a "narrative grammar" that guides the ways in which sequences of images convey meaning. Recent works have critiqued this linguistic orientation, such as Bateman and Wildfeuer's (2014) arguments that a grammar for sequential images is unnecessary. They assert that the notion of a grammar governing sequential images is problematic, and that the same information can be captured in a "discourse" based approach that dynamically updates meaningful information across juxtaposed images. This paper reviews these assertions, addresses their critiques about a grammar of sequential images, and then details the shortcomings of their own claims. Such discussion is directly grounded in the empirical evidence about how people comprehend sequences of images. In doing so, it reviews the assumptions and basic principles of the narrative grammar of the visual language used in comics, and it aims to demonstrate the empirical standards by which theories of comics' structure should adhere to. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-19
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume127
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Visual language
  • Narrative grammar
  • Comics
  • Linguistics
  • Empirical research
  • SEQUENTIAL IMAGE COMPREHENSION
  • EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
  • NARRATIVE COMPREHENSION
  • CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE
  • SEMANTIC INTEGRATION
  • DISCOURSE
  • BRAIN
  • TIME
  • INFERENCE
  • COMPONENT

Cite this

@article{374297c6b06f4b489b78e161926762f9,
title = "In defense of a {"}grammar{"} in the visual language of comics",
abstract = "Visual Language Theory (VLT) argues that the structure of drawn images is guided by similar cognitive principles as language, foremost a {"}narrative grammar{"} that guides the ways in which sequences of images convey meaning. Recent works have critiqued this linguistic orientation, such as Bateman and Wildfeuer's (2014) arguments that a grammar for sequential images is unnecessary. They assert that the notion of a grammar governing sequential images is problematic, and that the same information can be captured in a {"}discourse{"} based approach that dynamically updates meaningful information across juxtaposed images. This paper reviews these assertions, addresses their critiques about a grammar of sequential images, and then details the shortcomings of their own claims. Such discussion is directly grounded in the empirical evidence about how people comprehend sequences of images. In doing so, it reviews the assumptions and basic principles of the narrative grammar of the visual language used in comics, and it aims to demonstrate the empirical standards by which theories of comics' structure should adhere to. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Visual language, Narrative grammar, Comics, Linguistics, Empirical research, SEQUENTIAL IMAGE COMPREHENSION, EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, NARRATIVE COMPREHENSION, CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE, SEMANTIC INTEGRATION, DISCOURSE, BRAIN, TIME, INFERENCE, COMPONENT",
author = "Neil Cohn",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",

}

In defense of a "grammar" in the visual language of comics. / Cohn, Neil.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 127, 04.2018, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - In defense of a "grammar" in the visual language of comics

AU - Cohn,Neil

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Visual Language Theory (VLT) argues that the structure of drawn images is guided by similar cognitive principles as language, foremost a "narrative grammar" that guides the ways in which sequences of images convey meaning. Recent works have critiqued this linguistic orientation, such as Bateman and Wildfeuer's (2014) arguments that a grammar for sequential images is unnecessary. They assert that the notion of a grammar governing sequential images is problematic, and that the same information can be captured in a "discourse" based approach that dynamically updates meaningful information across juxtaposed images. This paper reviews these assertions, addresses their critiques about a grammar of sequential images, and then details the shortcomings of their own claims. Such discussion is directly grounded in the empirical evidence about how people comprehend sequences of images. In doing so, it reviews the assumptions and basic principles of the narrative grammar of the visual language used in comics, and it aims to demonstrate the empirical standards by which theories of comics' structure should adhere to. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Visual Language Theory (VLT) argues that the structure of drawn images is guided by similar cognitive principles as language, foremost a "narrative grammar" that guides the ways in which sequences of images convey meaning. Recent works have critiqued this linguistic orientation, such as Bateman and Wildfeuer's (2014) arguments that a grammar for sequential images is unnecessary. They assert that the notion of a grammar governing sequential images is problematic, and that the same information can be captured in a "discourse" based approach that dynamically updates meaningful information across juxtaposed images. This paper reviews these assertions, addresses their critiques about a grammar of sequential images, and then details the shortcomings of their own claims. Such discussion is directly grounded in the empirical evidence about how people comprehend sequences of images. In doing so, it reviews the assumptions and basic principles of the narrative grammar of the visual language used in comics, and it aims to demonstrate the empirical standards by which theories of comics' structure should adhere to. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Visual language

KW - Narrative grammar

KW - Comics

KW - Linguistics

KW - Empirical research

KW - SEQUENTIAL IMAGE COMPREHENSION

KW - EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS

KW - NARRATIVE COMPREHENSION

KW - CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE

KW - SEMANTIC INTEGRATION

KW - DISCOURSE

KW - BRAIN

KW - TIME

KW - INFERENCE

KW - COMPONENT

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

T2 - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -