TY - JOUR
T1 - In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity
T2 - Response to radder
AU - de Ridder, J.
AU - Bouter, L.
AU - Haven, T.
AU - Peels, R.
AU - Tijdink, J.
AU - Zeegers, M.P.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.
AB - We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.
KW - Mertonian norms
KW - Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity
KW - Research Integrity
KW - Responsible research and innovation
KW - Patenting
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=wosstart_imp_pure20230417&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000932013100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F08989621.2023.2167599
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147757014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599
DO - 10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599
M3 - Article
C2 - 36708135
SN - 0898-9621
VL - 30
SP - 276
EP - 283
JO - Accountability in Research
JF - Accountability in Research
IS - 5
ER -