In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity: Response to radder

J. de Ridder; L. Bouter; T. Haven; R. Peels; J. Tijdink; M.P. Zeegers

doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599

In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity: Response to radder

J. de Ridder^*
, L. Bouter
, T. Haven
, R. Peels
, J. Tijdink
, M.P. Zeegers

^*Corresponding author for this work

Methodology and Statistics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

143 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	276-283
Journal	Accountability in Research
Volume	30
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599
Publication status	Published - 2023

Keywords

Mertonian norms
Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity
Research Integrity
Responsible research and innovation
Patenting

Access to Document

10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599

MTO_Haven_In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity_AiR_2023Final published version, 579 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{2612ce8a570f4c82ac68fbafe3ab05b2,

title = "In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity: Response to radder",

abstract = "We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.",

keywords = "Mertonian norms, Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity, Research Integrity, Responsible research and innovation, Patenting",

author = "\{de Ridder\}, J. and L. Bouter and T. Haven and R. Peels and J. Tijdink and M.P. Zeegers",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "276--283",

journal = "Accountability in Research",

issn = "0898-9621",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity

T2 - Response to radder

AU - de Ridder, J.

AU - Bouter, L.

AU - Haven, T.

AU - Peels, R.

AU - Tijdink, J.

AU - Zeegers, M.P.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.

AB - We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.

KW - Mertonian norms

KW - Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity

KW - Research Integrity

KW - Responsible research and innovation

KW - Patenting

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=wosstart_imp_pure20230417&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000932013100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS

UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F08989621.2023.2167599

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147757014

U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599

DO - 10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599

M3 - Article

C2 - 36708135

SN - 0898-9621

VL - 30

SP - 276

EP - 283

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

IS - 5

ER -

In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity: Response to radder

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this