Income tax versus value added tax: A mixed-methods comparison of social representations

Jerome Olsen, C. Kogler, Jennifer Stark, Erich Kirchler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

To date, tax research has strongly focused on income tax compliance. Meanwhile, a large proportion of tax revenue is raised by consumption taxes, such as value added tax (VAT). This study compared the respective social representations of income tax and VAT by employed and self-employed taxpayers. The aim was to gain an understanding of similarities and differences in the overall quantitative evaluation and qualitative content of the two taxes. For this purpose, we administered a free association task to employed (n = 140) and self-employed (n = 349) Austrian taxpayers with the stimuli income tax and VAT (between-subject design). Moreover, we measured emotional reactions and knowledge referring to the two types of taxes as well as individuals’ mental accounting practices. Our results revealed that both taxes were evaluated negatively overall, although they did not differ from each other in their quantitative evaluation. Regarding employment status, self-employed taxpayers generated a larger number of negative associations, had higher knowledge, and expressed more negative emotions than employed taxpayers. The qualitative analysis also revealed that the social representations were specific to the two taxes. We conclude that findings from income tax research cannot be directly translated to the context of VAT.
LanguageEnglish
Pages87-107
JournalJournal of Tax Administration
Volume3
Issue number2
StatePublished - 6 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Tax
Mixed methods
Social representations
Income tax
Value added tax
Quantitative evaluation
Accounting practices
Tax revenues
Negative emotions
Consumption tax
Emotion
Employment status
Qualitative analysis
Tax compliance
Proportion
Mental accounting

Cite this

Olsen, Jerome ; Kogler, C. ; Stark, Jennifer ; Kirchler, Erich. / Income tax versus value added tax : A mixed-methods comparison of social representations. In: Journal of Tax Administration. 2017 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 87-107
@article{e8d1ecd6b18a4c53b7a095c6fe34d404,
title = "Income tax versus value added tax: A mixed-methods comparison of social representations",
abstract = "To date, tax research has strongly focused on income tax compliance. Meanwhile, a large proportion of tax revenue is raised by consumption taxes, such as value added tax (VAT). This study compared the respective social representations of income tax and VAT by employed and self-employed taxpayers. The aim was to gain an understanding of similarities and differences in the overall quantitative evaluation and qualitative content of the two taxes. For this purpose, we administered a free association task to employed (n = 140) and self-employed (n = 349) Austrian taxpayers with the stimuli income tax and VAT (between-subject design). Moreover, we measured emotional reactions and knowledge referring to the two types of taxes as well as individuals’ mental accounting practices. Our results revealed that both taxes were evaluated negatively overall, although they did not differ from each other in their quantitative evaluation. Regarding employment status, self-employed taxpayers generated a larger number of negative associations, had higher knowledge, and expressed more negative emotions than employed taxpayers. The qualitative analysis also revealed that the social representations were specific to the two taxes. We conclude that findings from income tax research cannot be directly translated to the context of VAT.",
author = "Jerome Olsen and C. Kogler and Jennifer Stark and Erich Kirchler",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "87--107",
journal = "Journal of Tax Administration",
number = "2",

}

Income tax versus value added tax : A mixed-methods comparison of social representations. / Olsen, Jerome; Kogler, C.; Stark, Jennifer; Kirchler, Erich.

In: Journal of Tax Administration, Vol. 3, No. 2, 06.12.2017, p. 87-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Income tax versus value added tax

T2 - Journal of Tax Administration

AU - Olsen,Jerome

AU - Kogler,C.

AU - Stark,Jennifer

AU - Kirchler,Erich

PY - 2017/12/6

Y1 - 2017/12/6

N2 - To date, tax research has strongly focused on income tax compliance. Meanwhile, a large proportion of tax revenue is raised by consumption taxes, such as value added tax (VAT). This study compared the respective social representations of income tax and VAT by employed and self-employed taxpayers. The aim was to gain an understanding of similarities and differences in the overall quantitative evaluation and qualitative content of the two taxes. For this purpose, we administered a free association task to employed (n = 140) and self-employed (n = 349) Austrian taxpayers with the stimuli income tax and VAT (between-subject design). Moreover, we measured emotional reactions and knowledge referring to the two types of taxes as well as individuals’ mental accounting practices. Our results revealed that both taxes were evaluated negatively overall, although they did not differ from each other in their quantitative evaluation. Regarding employment status, self-employed taxpayers generated a larger number of negative associations, had higher knowledge, and expressed more negative emotions than employed taxpayers. The qualitative analysis also revealed that the social representations were specific to the two taxes. We conclude that findings from income tax research cannot be directly translated to the context of VAT.

AB - To date, tax research has strongly focused on income tax compliance. Meanwhile, a large proportion of tax revenue is raised by consumption taxes, such as value added tax (VAT). This study compared the respective social representations of income tax and VAT by employed and self-employed taxpayers. The aim was to gain an understanding of similarities and differences in the overall quantitative evaluation and qualitative content of the two taxes. For this purpose, we administered a free association task to employed (n = 140) and self-employed (n = 349) Austrian taxpayers with the stimuli income tax and VAT (between-subject design). Moreover, we measured emotional reactions and knowledge referring to the two types of taxes as well as individuals’ mental accounting practices. Our results revealed that both taxes were evaluated negatively overall, although they did not differ from each other in their quantitative evaluation. Regarding employment status, self-employed taxpayers generated a larger number of negative associations, had higher knowledge, and expressed more negative emotions than employed taxpayers. The qualitative analysis also revealed that the social representations were specific to the two taxes. We conclude that findings from income tax research cannot be directly translated to the context of VAT.

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 87

EP - 107

JO - Journal of Tax Administration

JF - Journal of Tax Administration

IS - 2

ER -