Incorporating public values through multiple accountability: A case study on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands by an independent regulatory agency

Jolien van de Sande, Bert M de Graaff, D. Delnoij, Antoinette de Bont

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1178–1206
    JournalAdministration & Society
    Volume54
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Incorporating public values through multiple accountability: A case study on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands by an independent regulatory agency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this