Individualization: A double-edged sword: Welfare, the experience of social risks and the need for social insurance in the Netherlands

Peter Achterberg*, Judith Raven, Romke van der Veen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    For various reasons the process of individualization has always been supposed to be linked to a decline in welfare state support. Because of individualization, it is commonly argued people appreciate collectively organized welfare less and less. This article studies whether individualists really support the welfare state less than collectivists. In order to examine this, the authors use data collected in 2006 in the Netherlands. Distinguishing between two types of individualism, the study finds that people who are structurally disembedded from their institutional environment - the structural individualists - do not indeed support the welfare state. Moreover, for these structural individualists, the socioeconomic risks they run and their actual class position do not translate into support for the welfare state. Contrary to this, the study finds that people who can be classified as cultural individualists - those who emphasize individuality - are more supportive of the welfare state. For these cultural individualists it is also found that their socioeconomic position and interests influence the way they think about the welfare state. Cultural individualists hence are more supportive of the welfare state, and especially so for those in weak socioeconomic positions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)949-965
    Number of pages17
    JournalCurrent Sociology
    Volume61
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

    Keywords

    • Public support
    • social risks
    • structural and cultural individualization
    • values
    • welfare state legitimacy
    • CULTURE
    • SOCIETY
    • COUNTRIES
    • POLITICS
    • DUTCH

    Cite this

    @article{7d8f136bd7354f9ca61b4b34e3d6c154,
    title = "Individualization: A double-edged sword: Welfare, the experience of social risks and the need for social insurance in the Netherlands",
    abstract = "For various reasons the process of individualization has always been supposed to be linked to a decline in welfare state support. Because of individualization, it is commonly argued people appreciate collectively organized welfare less and less. This article studies whether individualists really support the welfare state less than collectivists. In order to examine this, the authors use data collected in 2006 in the Netherlands. Distinguishing between two types of individualism, the study finds that people who are structurally disembedded from their institutional environment - the structural individualists - do not indeed support the welfare state. Moreover, for these structural individualists, the socioeconomic risks they run and their actual class position do not translate into support for the welfare state. Contrary to this, the study finds that people who can be classified as cultural individualists - those who emphasize individuality - are more supportive of the welfare state. For these cultural individualists it is also found that their socioeconomic position and interests influence the way they think about the welfare state. Cultural individualists hence are more supportive of the welfare state, and especially so for those in weak socioeconomic positions.",
    keywords = "Public support, social risks, structural and cultural individualization, values, welfare state legitimacy, CULTURE, SOCIETY, COUNTRIES, POLITICS, DUTCH",
    author = "Peter Achterberg and Judith Raven and {van der Veen}, Romke",
    year = "2013",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1177/0011392113499738",
    language = "English",
    volume = "61",
    pages = "949--965",
    journal = "Current Sociology",
    issn = "0011-3921",
    publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
    number = "7",

    }

    Individualization : A double-edged sword: Welfare, the experience of social risks and the need for social insurance in the Netherlands. / Achterberg, Peter; Raven, Judith; van der Veen, Romke.

    In: Current Sociology, Vol. 61, No. 7, 11.2013, p. 949-965.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Individualization

    T2 - A double-edged sword: Welfare, the experience of social risks and the need for social insurance in the Netherlands

    AU - Achterberg, Peter

    AU - Raven, Judith

    AU - van der Veen, Romke

    PY - 2013/11

    Y1 - 2013/11

    N2 - For various reasons the process of individualization has always been supposed to be linked to a decline in welfare state support. Because of individualization, it is commonly argued people appreciate collectively organized welfare less and less. This article studies whether individualists really support the welfare state less than collectivists. In order to examine this, the authors use data collected in 2006 in the Netherlands. Distinguishing between two types of individualism, the study finds that people who are structurally disembedded from their institutional environment - the structural individualists - do not indeed support the welfare state. Moreover, for these structural individualists, the socioeconomic risks they run and their actual class position do not translate into support for the welfare state. Contrary to this, the study finds that people who can be classified as cultural individualists - those who emphasize individuality - are more supportive of the welfare state. For these cultural individualists it is also found that their socioeconomic position and interests influence the way they think about the welfare state. Cultural individualists hence are more supportive of the welfare state, and especially so for those in weak socioeconomic positions.

    AB - For various reasons the process of individualization has always been supposed to be linked to a decline in welfare state support. Because of individualization, it is commonly argued people appreciate collectively organized welfare less and less. This article studies whether individualists really support the welfare state less than collectivists. In order to examine this, the authors use data collected in 2006 in the Netherlands. Distinguishing between two types of individualism, the study finds that people who are structurally disembedded from their institutional environment - the structural individualists - do not indeed support the welfare state. Moreover, for these structural individualists, the socioeconomic risks they run and their actual class position do not translate into support for the welfare state. Contrary to this, the study finds that people who can be classified as cultural individualists - those who emphasize individuality - are more supportive of the welfare state. For these cultural individualists it is also found that their socioeconomic position and interests influence the way they think about the welfare state. Cultural individualists hence are more supportive of the welfare state, and especially so for those in weak socioeconomic positions.

    KW - Public support

    KW - social risks

    KW - structural and cultural individualization

    KW - values

    KW - welfare state legitimacy

    KW - CULTURE

    KW - SOCIETY

    KW - COUNTRIES

    KW - POLITICS

    KW - DUTCH

    U2 - 10.1177/0011392113499738

    DO - 10.1177/0011392113499738

    M3 - Article

    VL - 61

    SP - 949

    EP - 965

    JO - Current Sociology

    JF - Current Sociology

    SN - 0011-3921

    IS - 7

    ER -