Inductive reasoning in Zambia, Turkey, and the Netherlands Establishing cross-cultural equivalence

F.J.R. van de Vijver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Tasks of inductive reasoning and its component processes were administered to 704 Zambian, 877 Turkish, and 632 Dutch pupils from the highest two grades of primary and the lowest two grades of secondary school. All items were constructed using item-generating rules. Three types of equivalence were examined: structural equivalence (Does an instrument measure the same psychological concept in each country?), measurement unit equivalence (Do the scales have the same metric in each country?), and full score equivalence (full comparability of scores across countries). Structural and measurement unit equivalence were examined in two ways. First, a MIMIC (multiple indicators, multiple causes) structural equation model was fitted, with tasks for component processes as input and inductive reasoning tasks as output. Second, using a linear logistic model, the relationship between item difficulties and the difficulties of their constituent item-generating rules was examined in each country. Both analyses of equivalence provided strong evidence for structural equivalence, but only partial evidence for measurement unit equivalence. Full score equivalence was not supported
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-351
JournalIntelligence
Volume30
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Zambia
Turkey
Netherlands
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Equivalence
Inductive Reasoning
The Netherlands

Cite this

@article{cc3b16ee4ab94517b942173fd73d0743,
title = "Inductive reasoning in Zambia, Turkey, and the Netherlands Establishing cross-cultural equivalence",
abstract = "Tasks of inductive reasoning and its component processes were administered to 704 Zambian, 877 Turkish, and 632 Dutch pupils from the highest two grades of primary and the lowest two grades of secondary school. All items were constructed using item-generating rules. Three types of equivalence were examined: structural equivalence (Does an instrument measure the same psychological concept in each country?), measurement unit equivalence (Do the scales have the same metric in each country?), and full score equivalence (full comparability of scores across countries). Structural and measurement unit equivalence were examined in two ways. First, a MIMIC (multiple indicators, multiple causes) structural equation model was fitted, with tasks for component processes as input and inductive reasoning tasks as output. Second, using a linear logistic model, the relationship between item difficulties and the difficulties of their constituent item-generating rules was examined in each country. Both analyses of equivalence provided strong evidence for structural equivalence, but only partial evidence for measurement unit equivalence. Full score equivalence was not supported",
author = "{van de Vijver}, F.J.R.",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "313--351",
journal = "Intelligence",
issn = "0160-2896",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

Inductive reasoning in Zambia, Turkey, and the Netherlands Establishing cross-cultural equivalence. / van de Vijver, F.J.R.

In: Intelligence, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2002, p. 313-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inductive reasoning in Zambia, Turkey, and the Netherlands Establishing cross-cultural equivalence

AU - van de Vijver, F.J.R.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Tasks of inductive reasoning and its component processes were administered to 704 Zambian, 877 Turkish, and 632 Dutch pupils from the highest two grades of primary and the lowest two grades of secondary school. All items were constructed using item-generating rules. Three types of equivalence were examined: structural equivalence (Does an instrument measure the same psychological concept in each country?), measurement unit equivalence (Do the scales have the same metric in each country?), and full score equivalence (full comparability of scores across countries). Structural and measurement unit equivalence were examined in two ways. First, a MIMIC (multiple indicators, multiple causes) structural equation model was fitted, with tasks for component processes as input and inductive reasoning tasks as output. Second, using a linear logistic model, the relationship between item difficulties and the difficulties of their constituent item-generating rules was examined in each country. Both analyses of equivalence provided strong evidence for structural equivalence, but only partial evidence for measurement unit equivalence. Full score equivalence was not supported

AB - Tasks of inductive reasoning and its component processes were administered to 704 Zambian, 877 Turkish, and 632 Dutch pupils from the highest two grades of primary and the lowest two grades of secondary school. All items were constructed using item-generating rules. Three types of equivalence were examined: structural equivalence (Does an instrument measure the same psychological concept in each country?), measurement unit equivalence (Do the scales have the same metric in each country?), and full score equivalence (full comparability of scores across countries). Structural and measurement unit equivalence were examined in two ways. First, a MIMIC (multiple indicators, multiple causes) structural equation model was fitted, with tasks for component processes as input and inductive reasoning tasks as output. Second, using a linear logistic model, the relationship between item difficulties and the difficulties of their constituent item-generating rules was examined in each country. Both analyses of equivalence provided strong evidence for structural equivalence, but only partial evidence for measurement unit equivalence. Full score equivalence was not supported

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 313

EP - 351

JO - Intelligence

JF - Intelligence

SN - 0160-2896

IS - 4

ER -