Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A world-wide survey

H.P. van Dalen, C.J.I.M. Henkens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

202 Citations (Scopus)


How does publication pressure in modern-day universities affect the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards in science? By using a worldwide survey among demographers in developed and developing countries, the authors show that the large majority perceive the publication pressure as high, but more so in Anglo-Saxon countries and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. However, scholars see both the pros (upward mobility) and cons (excessive publication and uncitedness, neglect of policy issues, etc.) of the so-called publish-or-perish culture. By measuring behavior in terms of reading and publishing, and perceived extrinsic rewards and stated intrinsic rewards of practicing science, it turns out that publication pressure negatively affects the orientation of demographers towards policy and knowledge sharing. There are no signs that the pressure affects reading and publishing outside the core discipline.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1282-1293
JournalJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A world-wide survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this