Intention and action in retirement preparation

Job Krijnen, Seger Breugelmans, Anna van der Schors, Marcel Zeelenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Many people delay their preparation for retirement. Policy-makers often attempt to motivate people to take timely action by increasing the perceived importance of retirement saving, yet the effectiveness of such strategies can be doubted. We examined why a strategy of emphasizing importance may be ineffective by distinguishing between intention to prepare for retirement and action in actually taking steps toward preparation. Two surveys (n1 = 1171; n2 = 832) showed that importance and difficulty were both predictive of people's intentions to prepare for retirement, but that difficulty was a much stronger predictor of people's actual actions. Using data from an additional survey (n3 = 986), a series of follow-up tests provided further evidence that difficulty of retirement preparation is a stronger predictor of inaction than importance of retirement saving. These findings help explain why policies aimed at simplifying retirement preparation (e.g., automatic enrollment) have been more successful than policies aimed at increasing the importance of retirement saving (e.g., tax advantages).
LanguageEnglish
JournalBehavioral Public Policy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2019

Fingerprint

retirement

Cite this

@article{e463fb2720da4f2aa410989c58b37f1f,
title = "Intention and action in retirement preparation",
abstract = "Many people delay their preparation for retirement. Policy-makers often attempt to motivate people to take timely action by increasing the perceived importance of retirement saving, yet the effectiveness of such strategies can be doubted. We examined why a strategy of emphasizing importance may be ineffective by distinguishing between intention to prepare for retirement and action in actually taking steps toward preparation. Two surveys (n1 = 1171; n2 = 832) showed that importance and difficulty were both predictive of people's intentions to prepare for retirement, but that difficulty was a much stronger predictor of people's actual actions. Using data from an additional survey (n3 = 986), a series of follow-up tests provided further evidence that difficulty of retirement preparation is a stronger predictor of inaction than importance of retirement saving. These findings help explain why policies aimed at simplifying retirement preparation (e.g., automatic enrollment) have been more successful than policies aimed at increasing the importance of retirement saving (e.g., tax advantages).",
author = "Job Krijnen and Seger Breugelmans and {van der Schors}, Anna and Marcel Zeelenberg",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1017/bpp.2018.39",
language = "English",
journal = "Behavioral Public Policy",
issn = "2398-0648",
publisher = "Cambridge",

}

Intention and action in retirement preparation. / Krijnen, Job; Breugelmans, Seger; van der Schors, Anna; Zeelenberg, Marcel.

In: Behavioral Public Policy, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intention and action in retirement preparation

AU - Krijnen,Job

AU - Breugelmans,Seger

AU - van der Schors,Anna

AU - Zeelenberg,Marcel

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Many people delay their preparation for retirement. Policy-makers often attempt to motivate people to take timely action by increasing the perceived importance of retirement saving, yet the effectiveness of such strategies can be doubted. We examined why a strategy of emphasizing importance may be ineffective by distinguishing between intention to prepare for retirement and action in actually taking steps toward preparation. Two surveys (n1 = 1171; n2 = 832) showed that importance and difficulty were both predictive of people's intentions to prepare for retirement, but that difficulty was a much stronger predictor of people's actual actions. Using data from an additional survey (n3 = 986), a series of follow-up tests provided further evidence that difficulty of retirement preparation is a stronger predictor of inaction than importance of retirement saving. These findings help explain why policies aimed at simplifying retirement preparation (e.g., automatic enrollment) have been more successful than policies aimed at increasing the importance of retirement saving (e.g., tax advantages).

AB - Many people delay their preparation for retirement. Policy-makers often attempt to motivate people to take timely action by increasing the perceived importance of retirement saving, yet the effectiveness of such strategies can be doubted. We examined why a strategy of emphasizing importance may be ineffective by distinguishing between intention to prepare for retirement and action in actually taking steps toward preparation. Two surveys (n1 = 1171; n2 = 832) showed that importance and difficulty were both predictive of people's intentions to prepare for retirement, but that difficulty was a much stronger predictor of people's actual actions. Using data from an additional survey (n3 = 986), a series of follow-up tests provided further evidence that difficulty of retirement preparation is a stronger predictor of inaction than importance of retirement saving. These findings help explain why policies aimed at simplifying retirement preparation (e.g., automatic enrollment) have been more successful than policies aimed at increasing the importance of retirement saving (e.g., tax advantages).

U2 - 10.1017/bpp.2018.39

DO - 10.1017/bpp.2018.39

M3 - Article

JO - Behavioral Public Policy

T2 - Behavioral Public Policy

JF - Behavioral Public Policy

SN - 2398-0648

ER -