Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system: Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Intergenerational equity has rarely been related to the management of Antarctica. This contribution discusses the question to what extent the principle of intergenerational equity has been implemented in the Antarctic Region through the instruments of the Antarctic Treaty system (ATS). A complicated question, not only because the ATS itself is comprehensive, but particularly because intergenerational equity is a complex principle that can be viewed from many angles. This contribution builds on Edith Brown-Weiss’ view that a balanced and fair relationship between generations of humankind depends in part on a responsible relationship between man and nature. On the basis of the rich literature on intergenerational equity and the types of human-nature relationships that have been distinguished by environmental philosophers, the theoretical part of this contribution develops three sub-questions for discussing the ATS. It is concluded that the Consultative Parties have made substantial efforts to implement intergenerational equity for the Antarctic Region, as far as the environmental component of this principle is concerned. The continuing efforts to prevent ‘mastery’ (the term in environmental philosophy for nature subordinated to humanity; see Section 3) and the comprehensive ecosystem approach of the ATS instruments safeguard to a large extent options for future generations to enjoy Antarctica’s environment and natural resources. However, a number of concerns is identified that might limit the ATS’ ability to prevent mastery. Furthermore, because an explicit policy on wilderness protection is lacking, the ATS does not safeguard the option for future generation to value and enjoy Antarctica as one of the last wilderness regions of the earth. This contribution ends with a glimpse into the future: to ensure intergenerational equity in Antarctic management, the ATS must continue and strengthen its efforts to prevent mastery in the Antarctic Region. The best way to ensure this is to prevent ‘no rule’-situations. Such efforts are also in the ATS’ self-interest: ensuring intergenerational equity is important for the stability of the ATS itself as mastery will destroy the balance of interests.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Yearbook of Polar Law
    EditorsK. Hossain, G. Alfredsson, T. Koivurova
    Place of PublicationBoston | Leiden
    PublisherBrill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
    Pages635-682
    Volume3
    EditionSpecial Edition
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    treaty
    equity
    Antarctica
    management
    natural resources
    ability
    Values

    Keywords

    • intergenerational equity
    • fairness
    • future generations
    • mankind
    • mastery
    • stewardship
    • Antarctic
    • nature conservation law
    • humankind
    • human-nature relationship
    • precautionary principle
    • exploitation
    • sustainability
    • wilderness
    • environmental philosophy
    • claim
    • property
    • ownership

    Cite this

    Bastmeijer, K. (2011). Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system: Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'. In K. Hossain, G. Alfredsson, & T. Koivurova (Eds.), The Yearbook of Polar Law (Special Edition ed., Vol. 3, pp. 635-682). Boston | Leiden: Brill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    Bastmeijer, Kees. / Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system : Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'. The Yearbook of Polar Law. editor / K. Hossain ; G. Alfredsson ; T. Koivurova. Vol. 3 Special Edition. ed. Boston | Leiden : Brill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011. pp. 635-682
    @inbook{4015df6b740644f28f5abf6ecc828d5f,
    title = "Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system: Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'",
    abstract = "Intergenerational equity has rarely been related to the management of Antarctica. This contribution discusses the question to what extent the principle of intergenerational equity has been implemented in the Antarctic Region through the instruments of the Antarctic Treaty system (ATS). A complicated question, not only because the ATS itself is comprehensive, but particularly because intergenerational equity is a complex principle that can be viewed from many angles. This contribution builds on Edith Brown-Weiss’ view that a balanced and fair relationship between generations of humankind depends in part on a responsible relationship between man and nature. On the basis of the rich literature on intergenerational equity and the types of human-nature relationships that have been distinguished by environmental philosophers, the theoretical part of this contribution develops three sub-questions for discussing the ATS. It is concluded that the Consultative Parties have made substantial efforts to implement intergenerational equity for the Antarctic Region, as far as the environmental component of this principle is concerned. The continuing efforts to prevent ‘mastery’ (the term in environmental philosophy for nature subordinated to humanity; see Section 3) and the comprehensive ecosystem approach of the ATS instruments safeguard to a large extent options for future generations to enjoy Antarctica’s environment and natural resources. However, a number of concerns is identified that might limit the ATS’ ability to prevent mastery. Furthermore, because an explicit policy on wilderness protection is lacking, the ATS does not safeguard the option for future generation to value and enjoy Antarctica as one of the last wilderness regions of the earth. This contribution ends with a glimpse into the future: to ensure intergenerational equity in Antarctic management, the ATS must continue and strengthen its efforts to prevent mastery in the Antarctic Region. The best way to ensure this is to prevent ‘no rule’-situations. Such efforts are also in the ATS’ self-interest: ensuring intergenerational equity is important for the stability of the ATS itself as mastery will destroy the balance of interests.",
    keywords = "intergenerational equity, fairness, future generations, mankind, mastery, stewardship, Antarctic, nature conservation law, humankind, human-nature relationship, precautionary principle, exploitation, sustainability, wilderness, environmental philosophy, claim, property, ownership",
    author = "Kees Bastmeijer",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "635--682",
    editor = "K. Hossain and G. Alfredsson and T. Koivurova",
    booktitle = "The Yearbook of Polar Law",
    publisher = "Brill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",
    edition = "Special Edition",

    }

    Bastmeijer, K 2011, Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system: Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'. in K Hossain, G Alfredsson & T Koivurova (eds), The Yearbook of Polar Law. Special Edition edn, vol. 3, Brill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston | Leiden, pp. 635-682.

    Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system : Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'. / Bastmeijer, Kees.

    The Yearbook of Polar Law. ed. / K. Hossain; G. Alfredsson; T. Koivurova. Vol. 3 Special Edition. ed. Boston | Leiden : Brill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011. p. 635-682.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system

    T2 - Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'

    AU - Bastmeijer, Kees

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Intergenerational equity has rarely been related to the management of Antarctica. This contribution discusses the question to what extent the principle of intergenerational equity has been implemented in the Antarctic Region through the instruments of the Antarctic Treaty system (ATS). A complicated question, not only because the ATS itself is comprehensive, but particularly because intergenerational equity is a complex principle that can be viewed from many angles. This contribution builds on Edith Brown-Weiss’ view that a balanced and fair relationship between generations of humankind depends in part on a responsible relationship between man and nature. On the basis of the rich literature on intergenerational equity and the types of human-nature relationships that have been distinguished by environmental philosophers, the theoretical part of this contribution develops three sub-questions for discussing the ATS. It is concluded that the Consultative Parties have made substantial efforts to implement intergenerational equity for the Antarctic Region, as far as the environmental component of this principle is concerned. The continuing efforts to prevent ‘mastery’ (the term in environmental philosophy for nature subordinated to humanity; see Section 3) and the comprehensive ecosystem approach of the ATS instruments safeguard to a large extent options for future generations to enjoy Antarctica’s environment and natural resources. However, a number of concerns is identified that might limit the ATS’ ability to prevent mastery. Furthermore, because an explicit policy on wilderness protection is lacking, the ATS does not safeguard the option for future generation to value and enjoy Antarctica as one of the last wilderness regions of the earth. This contribution ends with a glimpse into the future: to ensure intergenerational equity in Antarctic management, the ATS must continue and strengthen its efforts to prevent mastery in the Antarctic Region. The best way to ensure this is to prevent ‘no rule’-situations. Such efforts are also in the ATS’ self-interest: ensuring intergenerational equity is important for the stability of the ATS itself as mastery will destroy the balance of interests.

    AB - Intergenerational equity has rarely been related to the management of Antarctica. This contribution discusses the question to what extent the principle of intergenerational equity has been implemented in the Antarctic Region through the instruments of the Antarctic Treaty system (ATS). A complicated question, not only because the ATS itself is comprehensive, but particularly because intergenerational equity is a complex principle that can be viewed from many angles. This contribution builds on Edith Brown-Weiss’ view that a balanced and fair relationship between generations of humankind depends in part on a responsible relationship between man and nature. On the basis of the rich literature on intergenerational equity and the types of human-nature relationships that have been distinguished by environmental philosophers, the theoretical part of this contribution develops three sub-questions for discussing the ATS. It is concluded that the Consultative Parties have made substantial efforts to implement intergenerational equity for the Antarctic Region, as far as the environmental component of this principle is concerned. The continuing efforts to prevent ‘mastery’ (the term in environmental philosophy for nature subordinated to humanity; see Section 3) and the comprehensive ecosystem approach of the ATS instruments safeguard to a large extent options for future generations to enjoy Antarctica’s environment and natural resources. However, a number of concerns is identified that might limit the ATS’ ability to prevent mastery. Furthermore, because an explicit policy on wilderness protection is lacking, the ATS does not safeguard the option for future generation to value and enjoy Antarctica as one of the last wilderness regions of the earth. This contribution ends with a glimpse into the future: to ensure intergenerational equity in Antarctic management, the ATS must continue and strengthen its efforts to prevent mastery in the Antarctic Region. The best way to ensure this is to prevent ‘no rule’-situations. Such efforts are also in the ATS’ self-interest: ensuring intergenerational equity is important for the stability of the ATS itself as mastery will destroy the balance of interests.

    KW - intergenerational equity

    KW - fairness

    KW - future generations

    KW - mankind

    KW - mastery

    KW - stewardship

    KW - Antarctic

    KW - nature conservation law

    KW - humankind

    KW - human-nature relationship

    KW - precautionary principle

    KW - exploitation

    KW - sustainability

    KW - wilderness

    KW - environmental philosophy

    KW - claim

    KW - property

    KW - ownership

    M3 - Chapter

    VL - 3

    SP - 635

    EP - 682

    BT - The Yearbook of Polar Law

    A2 - Hossain, K.

    A2 - Alfredsson, G.

    A2 - Koivurova, T.

    PB - Brill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

    CY - Boston | Leiden

    ER -

    Bastmeijer K. Intergenerational equity and the Antarctic treaty system: Continued efforts to prevent 'mastery'. In Hossain K, Alfredsson G, Koivurova T, editors, The Yearbook of Polar Law. Special Edition ed. Vol. 3. Boston | Leiden: Brill | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2011. p. 635-682