Abstract
Trade barriers mayimprove welfare if propertyrights with respect to renewable natural resources are
lacking. Previous studies focus on the role of overharvesting, but we argue that trade-induced habitat
destruction should also be taken into account. Habitat is one of the keyfactors determining the long-run
viabilityof manynatural resources, and economic activityoftentimes goes at the expense of habitat. While
open access gives rise to within-industryexternalities, habitat destruction creates across-industry
externalities. We identifyunder what circumstances trade liberalization is welfare-enhancing as well as
contributing to nature conservation, and analyze the consequences of trade policy.
r 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
lacking. Previous studies focus on the role of overharvesting, but we argue that trade-induced habitat
destruction should also be taken into account. Habitat is one of the keyfactors determining the long-run
viabilityof manynatural resources, and economic activityoftentimes goes at the expense of habitat. While
open access gives rise to within-industryexternalities, habitat destruction creates across-industry
externalities. We identifyunder what circumstances trade liberalization is welfare-enhancing as well as
contributing to nature conservation, and analyze the consequences of trade policy.
r 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 891-910 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Keywords
- trade policy
- trade liberalization
- nature conservation
- renewable resources
- species diversity