Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy.

Pierre Larouche, Geertrui Van Overwalle

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

While the traditional literature and the policy statements concerning standardization as such emphasize the benefits of standardization, the intellectual property and competition law literature and policymaking has been more critical of standardization. Intellectual property is relevant, as the technology embedded in a standard is often protected with so-called Standard Essential Patents (SEPs). Similarly, competition law is relevant to the collective behaviour of private firms in creating and operating Standard-Setting Organisations (SSOs), and to their individual behaviour in notifying and licensing their intellectual property. In recent litigation, three issues have risen to the fore, popularized under the labels “patent ambush”, “patent holdup” and “patent thickets”. There is a risk that the discussion of standardization, in academic and policy circles, becomes reduced to these issues. The paper advocates a more holistic approach, and sets out avenues for future research, including an investigation of the consequences of a broader and more nuanced view of the various parameters of standardization, an analysis of the relationship between standards and innovation, and a review of the interplay between the private and public aspects of standardization.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe law, economics and politics of international standardisation
EditorsPanagiotis Delimatsis
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages367-393
Number of pages26
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

competition policy
patent
intellectual property
Law
holistic approach
collective behavior
innovation
firm
literature

Cite this

Larouche, P., & Van Overwalle, G. (2015). Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy. In P. Delimatsis (Ed.), The law, economics and politics of international standardisation (pp. 367-393). Cambridge University Press.
Larouche, Pierre ; Van Overwalle, Geertrui. / Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy. The law, economics and politics of international standardisation. editor / Panagiotis Delimatsis. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 367-393
@inbook{f284811634d34ebbb8879f631c4ef07a,
title = "Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy.",
abstract = "While the traditional literature and the policy statements concerning standardization as such emphasize the benefits of standardization, the intellectual property and competition law literature and policymaking has been more critical of standardization. Intellectual property is relevant, as the technology embedded in a standard is often protected with so-called Standard Essential Patents (SEPs). Similarly, competition law is relevant to the collective behaviour of private firms in creating and operating Standard-Setting Organisations (SSOs), and to their individual behaviour in notifying and licensing their intellectual property. In recent litigation, three issues have risen to the fore, popularized under the labels “patent ambush”, “patent holdup” and “patent thickets”. There is a risk that the discussion of standardization, in academic and policy circles, becomes reduced to these issues. The paper advocates a more holistic approach, and sets out avenues for future research, including an investigation of the consequences of a broader and more nuanced view of the various parameters of standardization, an analysis of the relationship between standards and innovation, and a review of the interplay between the private and public aspects of standardization.",
author = "Pierre Larouche and {Van Overwalle}, Geertrui",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
pages = "367--393",
editor = "Panagiotis Delimatsis",
booktitle = "The law, economics and politics of international standardisation",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Larouche, P & Van Overwalle, G 2015, Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy. in P Delimatsis (ed.), The law, economics and politics of international standardisation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 367-393.

Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy. / Larouche, Pierre; Van Overwalle, Geertrui.

The law, economics and politics of international standardisation. ed. / Panagiotis Delimatsis. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 367-393.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy.

AU - Larouche, Pierre

AU - Van Overwalle, Geertrui

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - While the traditional literature and the policy statements concerning standardization as such emphasize the benefits of standardization, the intellectual property and competition law literature and policymaking has been more critical of standardization. Intellectual property is relevant, as the technology embedded in a standard is often protected with so-called Standard Essential Patents (SEPs). Similarly, competition law is relevant to the collective behaviour of private firms in creating and operating Standard-Setting Organisations (SSOs), and to their individual behaviour in notifying and licensing their intellectual property. In recent litigation, three issues have risen to the fore, popularized under the labels “patent ambush”, “patent holdup” and “patent thickets”. There is a risk that the discussion of standardization, in academic and policy circles, becomes reduced to these issues. The paper advocates a more holistic approach, and sets out avenues for future research, including an investigation of the consequences of a broader and more nuanced view of the various parameters of standardization, an analysis of the relationship between standards and innovation, and a review of the interplay between the private and public aspects of standardization.

AB - While the traditional literature and the policy statements concerning standardization as such emphasize the benefits of standardization, the intellectual property and competition law literature and policymaking has been more critical of standardization. Intellectual property is relevant, as the technology embedded in a standard is often protected with so-called Standard Essential Patents (SEPs). Similarly, competition law is relevant to the collective behaviour of private firms in creating and operating Standard-Setting Organisations (SSOs), and to their individual behaviour in notifying and licensing their intellectual property. In recent litigation, three issues have risen to the fore, popularized under the labels “patent ambush”, “patent holdup” and “patent thickets”. There is a risk that the discussion of standardization, in academic and policy circles, becomes reduced to these issues. The paper advocates a more holistic approach, and sets out avenues for future research, including an investigation of the consequences of a broader and more nuanced view of the various parameters of standardization, an analysis of the relationship between standards and innovation, and a review of the interplay between the private and public aspects of standardization.

M3 - Chapter

SP - 367

EP - 393

BT - The law, economics and politics of international standardisation

A2 - Delimatsis, Panagiotis

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Larouche P, Van Overwalle G. Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy. In Delimatsis P, editor, The law, economics and politics of international standardisation. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 367-393