Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Investigating a metrical Hebb effect of lists of words

  • A. Paice
  • , A. Johnson
  • , R. Legg
  • , E. Smalle
  • , M. Page*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In four experiments, we describe the first finding of a Metrical Hebb Effect. Participants are shown to exhibit a Hebb Repetition Effect for repeating list-wide stress patterns across sequences of familiar words, even though the lexical items within the “repeating” lists do not themselves repeat. Experiment 1 established the presence of a Hebb effect for metrical patterns, demonstrating significant learning of list-wide metrical patterns over successive presentations. Experiment 2 investigated the effect’s longevity, showing the persistence of learned metrical information after a spacing of three non-repeating lists. Experiment 3 revealed that the effect did not persist over a longer spacing of eight intervening lists. Experiment 4 investigated the learning mechanism, suggesting that chunking, rather than item-position binding, might account for the observed learning of metrical patterns. The authors propose that metrical-pattern learning represents a process of gradual integration of sequences of weak and strong stress accents into higher-level units representing the stress patterns within, and across, words. We briefly discuss some implications of the Metrical Hebb Effect for phonological word-form learning and for speech perception and production.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-309
Number of pages26
JournalThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume78
Issue number2
Early online dateNov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Hebb Repetition Effect
  • Immediate serial recall
  • Metrical patterns
  • Working memory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating a metrical Hebb effect of lists of words'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this