Investors' evaluations of price-increase preannouncements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Several firms preannounce their price increases with the expectation that such announcements will be evaluated favorably by investors. However, little is known about the actual effect they have on shareholder value. Accordingly, the authors present the first systematic empirical examination of investors' evaluations of 274 price-increase preannouncements (PIPs). Results show that whereas the average increase in abnormal returns following a PIP is 0.51%, almost 41% of the PIPs result in negative abnormal returns. To explore this heterogeneity, the authors propose a conceptual framework that focuses on three key pieces of information that investors can use when evaluating a PIP: information on the nature (time to implementation and magnitude) of the preannounced price increase, the stated attribution for the preannounced price increase (demand and/or cost based), and information on prior PIP occurrences by the firm and its competitors. Results indicate that PIPs with greater time to implementation, higher own precedence and greater competitive precedence result in lower abnormal returns, while PIPs with higher magnitude and PIPs with an explicit demand attribution result in greater abnormal returns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-377
JournalInternational Journal of Research in Marketing
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Investors
Evaluation
Preannouncements
Abnormal returns
Attribution
Announcement
Nature
Conceptual framework
Competitors
Shareholder value
Costs

Keywords

  • price increase
  • preannouncement
  • event study
  • abnormal returns
  • marketing-finance interface

Cite this

@article{21ec76dd879d42be92e44540456d85ce,
title = "Investors' evaluations of price-increase preannouncements",
abstract = "Several firms preannounce their price increases with the expectation that such announcements will be evaluated favorably by investors. However, little is known about the actual effect they have on shareholder value. Accordingly, the authors present the first systematic empirical examination of investors' evaluations of 274 price-increase preannouncements (PIPs). Results show that whereas the average increase in abnormal returns following a PIP is 0.51{\%}, almost 41{\%} of the PIPs result in negative abnormal returns. To explore this heterogeneity, the authors propose a conceptual framework that focuses on three key pieces of information that investors can use when evaluating a PIP: information on the nature (time to implementation and magnitude) of the preannounced price increase, the stated attribution for the preannounced price increase (demand and/or cost based), and information on prior PIP occurrences by the firm and its competitors. Results indicate that PIPs with greater time to implementation, higher own precedence and greater competitive precedence result in lower abnormal returns, while PIPs with higher magnitude and PIPs with an explicit demand attribution result in greater abnormal returns.",
keywords = "price increase, preannouncement, event study, abnormal returns, marketing-finance interface",
author = "Lim, {Leon Gim} and K.R. Tuli and Marnik Dekimpe",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "359--377",
journal = "International Journal of Research in Marketing",
issn = "0167-8116",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",
number = "3",

}

Investors' evaluations of price-increase preannouncements. / Lim, Leon Gim; Tuli, K.R.; Dekimpe, Marnik.

In: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 35, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 359-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investors' evaluations of price-increase preannouncements

AU - Lim, Leon Gim

AU - Tuli, K.R.

AU - Dekimpe, Marnik

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Several firms preannounce their price increases with the expectation that such announcements will be evaluated favorably by investors. However, little is known about the actual effect they have on shareholder value. Accordingly, the authors present the first systematic empirical examination of investors' evaluations of 274 price-increase preannouncements (PIPs). Results show that whereas the average increase in abnormal returns following a PIP is 0.51%, almost 41% of the PIPs result in negative abnormal returns. To explore this heterogeneity, the authors propose a conceptual framework that focuses on three key pieces of information that investors can use when evaluating a PIP: information on the nature (time to implementation and magnitude) of the preannounced price increase, the stated attribution for the preannounced price increase (demand and/or cost based), and information on prior PIP occurrences by the firm and its competitors. Results indicate that PIPs with greater time to implementation, higher own precedence and greater competitive precedence result in lower abnormal returns, while PIPs with higher magnitude and PIPs with an explicit demand attribution result in greater abnormal returns.

AB - Several firms preannounce their price increases with the expectation that such announcements will be evaluated favorably by investors. However, little is known about the actual effect they have on shareholder value. Accordingly, the authors present the first systematic empirical examination of investors' evaluations of 274 price-increase preannouncements (PIPs). Results show that whereas the average increase in abnormal returns following a PIP is 0.51%, almost 41% of the PIPs result in negative abnormal returns. To explore this heterogeneity, the authors propose a conceptual framework that focuses on three key pieces of information that investors can use when evaluating a PIP: information on the nature (time to implementation and magnitude) of the preannounced price increase, the stated attribution for the preannounced price increase (demand and/or cost based), and information on prior PIP occurrences by the firm and its competitors. Results indicate that PIPs with greater time to implementation, higher own precedence and greater competitive precedence result in lower abnormal returns, while PIPs with higher magnitude and PIPs with an explicit demand attribution result in greater abnormal returns.

KW - price increase

KW - preannouncement

KW - event study

KW - abnormal returns

KW - marketing-finance interface

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.06.001

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 359

EP - 377

JO - International Journal of Research in Marketing

JF - International Journal of Research in Marketing

SN - 0167-8116

IS - 3

ER -