Invisibility and interpretation

Michael H Herzog, Frouke Hermens, Haluk Oğmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)975
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Herzog, Michael H ; Hermens, Frouke ; Oğmen, Haluk. / Invisibility and interpretation. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 5. pp. 975.
@article{40f15fa89d1a4a76a4d5c95efd2ffec6,
title = "Invisibility and interpretation",
abstract = "Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.",
author = "Herzog, {Michael H} and Frouke Hermens and Haluk Oğmen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "975",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Herzog, MH, Hermens, F & Oğmen, H 2014, 'Invisibility and interpretation', Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, pp. 975. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975

Invisibility and interpretation. / Herzog, Michael H; Hermens, Frouke; Oğmen, Haluk.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, 2014, p. 975.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invisibility and interpretation

AU - Herzog, Michael H

AU - Hermens, Frouke

AU - Oğmen, Haluk

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.

AB - Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975

M3 - Article

C2 - 25278910

VL - 5

SP - 975

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

ER -