Abstract
This debate considers whether climate change is a human rights violation and introduces students to normative political theory and the international human rights law (HRL) framework. Catriona McKinnon argues that climate change is already damaging a morally fundamental subset of human rights and will continue to do so in the future. All persons, present and future, have basic rights to subsistence and security and this generates a general duty for all people to work to create and support rights-respecting institutions.
Marie-Catherine Petersmann challenges this position by highlighting the difficulties of
applying the HRL framework to climate change which, by its very nature, is a collective
action problem that cannot easily be linked to one duty bearer and one victim. Instead, she draws upon new insights from environmental humanities to offer a different way of thinking about co-responsible agents and beneficiaries of a stable climate.
Marie-Catherine Petersmann challenges this position by highlighting the difficulties of
applying the HRL framework to climate change which, by its very nature, is a collective
action problem that cannot easily be linked to one duty bearer and one victim. Instead, she draws upon new insights from environmental humanities to offer a different way of thinking about co-responsible agents and beneficiaries of a stable climate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Contemporary climate change debates |
| Subtitle of host publication | A student primer |
| Editors | Mike Hulme |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Chapter | 11 |
| Pages | 160-173 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780429446252 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138332997 |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Dec 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |