Is emotional suppression always bad?

A matter of flexibility and gender differences

Guyonne Rogier, C. Garofalo, Patrizia Velotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Although emotional suppression has usually been considered to be associated to psychopathological symptoms and aggression, different studies yielded controversial findings and highlighted possible gender differences in these relationships. In an attempt to cast light on this issue, we administered to a sample of 380 community-dwelling individuals the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Aggression Questionnaire and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised. Gender differences (favoring women) emerged on the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Interestingly, associations of emotional suppression were only significant among females, and mainly regarded psychological distress. In an attempt to test whether the flexibility in the use of emotion regulation strategies was more important for psychological well-being, we tested interaction effects between reappraisal and suppression on psychopathological diseases and aggression measures. Significant interaction effects were found among men and only on aggressive measures. Such results confirmed gender differences in emotion regulation and the relevance of flexibility in the use of emotional regulation strategies as part of adaptive emotional functioning.
Keywords: Emotion regulation Aggression Psychopathology Gender differences Emotional suppression Cognitive reappraisal
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-420
JournalCurrent Psychology
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Independent Living
Checklist
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • AGGRESSION
  • Aggression
  • Cognitive reappraisal
  • Emotion regulation
  • Emotional suppression
  • Gender differences
  • INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
  • MEDIATING ROLE
  • NEGATIVE AFFECT
  • Psychopathology
  • STRATEGIES

Cite this

Rogier, Guyonne ; Garofalo, C. ; Velotti, Patrizia. / Is emotional suppression always bad? A matter of flexibility and gender differences. In: Current Psychology. 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 411-420.
@article{29c72e29bdd246faa291c01ebd3b5908,
title = "Is emotional suppression always bad?: A matter of flexibility and gender differences",
abstract = "Although emotional suppression has usually been considered to be associated to psychopathological symptoms and aggression, different studies yielded controversial findings and highlighted possible gender differences in these relationships. In an attempt to cast light on this issue, we administered to a sample of 380 community-dwelling individuals the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Aggression Questionnaire and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised. Gender differences (favoring women) emerged on the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Interestingly, associations of emotional suppression were only significant among females, and mainly regarded psychological distress. In an attempt to test whether the flexibility in the use of emotion regulation strategies was more important for psychological well-being, we tested interaction effects between reappraisal and suppression on psychopathological diseases and aggression measures. Significant interaction effects were found among men and only on aggressive measures. Such results confirmed gender differences in emotion regulation and the relevance of flexibility in the use of emotional regulation strategies as part of adaptive emotional functioning.Keywords: Emotion regulation Aggression Psychopathology Gender differences Emotional suppression Cognitive reappraisal",
keywords = "AGGRESSION, Aggression, Cognitive reappraisal, Emotion regulation, Emotional suppression, Gender differences, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, MEDIATING ROLE, NEGATIVE AFFECT, Psychopathology, STRATEGIES",
author = "Guyonne Rogier and C. Garofalo and Patrizia Velotti",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s12144-017-9623-7",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "411--420",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "1046-1310",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Is emotional suppression always bad? A matter of flexibility and gender differences. / Rogier, Guyonne; Garofalo, C.; Velotti, Patrizia.

In: Current Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2019, p. 411-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is emotional suppression always bad?

T2 - A matter of flexibility and gender differences

AU - Rogier, Guyonne

AU - Garofalo, C.

AU - Velotti, Patrizia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Although emotional suppression has usually been considered to be associated to psychopathological symptoms and aggression, different studies yielded controversial findings and highlighted possible gender differences in these relationships. In an attempt to cast light on this issue, we administered to a sample of 380 community-dwelling individuals the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Aggression Questionnaire and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised. Gender differences (favoring women) emerged on the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Interestingly, associations of emotional suppression were only significant among females, and mainly regarded psychological distress. In an attempt to test whether the flexibility in the use of emotion regulation strategies was more important for psychological well-being, we tested interaction effects between reappraisal and suppression on psychopathological diseases and aggression measures. Significant interaction effects were found among men and only on aggressive measures. Such results confirmed gender differences in emotion regulation and the relevance of flexibility in the use of emotional regulation strategies as part of adaptive emotional functioning.Keywords: Emotion regulation Aggression Psychopathology Gender differences Emotional suppression Cognitive reappraisal

AB - Although emotional suppression has usually been considered to be associated to psychopathological symptoms and aggression, different studies yielded controversial findings and highlighted possible gender differences in these relationships. In an attempt to cast light on this issue, we administered to a sample of 380 community-dwelling individuals the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Aggression Questionnaire and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised. Gender differences (favoring women) emerged on the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Interestingly, associations of emotional suppression were only significant among females, and mainly regarded psychological distress. In an attempt to test whether the flexibility in the use of emotion regulation strategies was more important for psychological well-being, we tested interaction effects between reappraisal and suppression on psychopathological diseases and aggression measures. Significant interaction effects were found among men and only on aggressive measures. Such results confirmed gender differences in emotion regulation and the relevance of flexibility in the use of emotional regulation strategies as part of adaptive emotional functioning.Keywords: Emotion regulation Aggression Psychopathology Gender differences Emotional suppression Cognitive reappraisal

KW - AGGRESSION

KW - Aggression

KW - Cognitive reappraisal

KW - Emotion regulation

KW - Emotional suppression

KW - Gender differences

KW - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES

KW - MEDIATING ROLE

KW - NEGATIVE AFFECT

KW - Psychopathology

KW - STRATEGIES

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-017-9623-7

DO - 10.1007/s12144-017-9623-7

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 411

EP - 420

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 1046-1310

IS - 2

ER -