Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking?

A.C. Bertay, A. Demirgüc-Kunt, H.P. Huizinga

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A bank’s interest expenses are found to increase with its degree of internationalization as proxied by its share of foreign liabilities in total liabilities or a Herfindahl index of international liability concentration, especially if the bank is performing badly. Our benchmark estimation suggests that an international bank’s cost of funds raised through a foreign subsidiary is between 1.5% and 2.4% higher than the cost of funds for a purely domestic bank, which is a sizeable difference given an overall mean cost of funds of 3.3%. These results are consistent with limited incentives for national authorities to bail out an international bank, but also with an international bank recovery and resolution process that is inefficient. In any event, the operation of the financial safety net appears to be a barrier to cross-border banking.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEBC
Number of pages61
Volume2011-037
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Publication series

NameEBC Discussion Paper
Volume2011-037

Fingerprint

Cross-border
Financial safety net
Banking
Liability
Costs
Benchmark
Foreign subsidiaries
Bailout
Authority
Expenses
Incentives
Herfindahl index
Degree of internationalization

Keywords

  • Bank bailouts
  • International burden sharing
  • Cross-border banking

Cite this

Bertay, A. C., Demirgüc-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. P. (2011). Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking? (EBC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-037). Tilburg: EBC.
Bertay, A.C. ; Demirgüc-Kunt, A. ; Huizinga, H.P. / Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking?. Tilburg : EBC, 2011. (EBC Discussion Paper).
@techreport{344b0c5f14b64a5ea5215f504358e238,
title = "Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking?",
abstract = "A bank’s interest expenses are found to increase with its degree of internationalization as proxied by its share of foreign liabilities in total liabilities or a Herfindahl index of international liability concentration, especially if the bank is performing badly. Our benchmark estimation suggests that an international bank’s cost of funds raised through a foreign subsidiary is between 1.5{\%} and 2.4{\%} higher than the cost of funds for a purely domestic bank, which is a sizeable difference given an overall mean cost of funds of 3.3{\%}. These results are consistent with limited incentives for national authorities to bail out an international bank, but also with an international bank recovery and resolution process that is inefficient. In any event, the operation of the financial safety net appears to be a barrier to cross-border banking.",
keywords = "Bank bailouts, International burden sharing, Cross-border banking",
author = "A.C. Bertay and A. Demirg{\"u}c-Kunt and H.P. Huizinga",
note = "This is also CentER Discussion Paper 2011-132 Pagination: 61",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "2011-037",
series = "EBC Discussion Paper",
publisher = "EBC",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "EBC",

}

Bertay, AC, Demirgüc-Kunt, A & Huizinga, HP 2011 'Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking?' EBC Discussion Paper, vol. 2011-037, EBC, Tilburg.

Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking? / Bertay, A.C.; Demirgüc-Kunt, A.; Huizinga, H.P.

Tilburg : EBC, 2011. (EBC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-037).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking?

AU - Bertay, A.C.

AU - Demirgüc-Kunt, A.

AU - Huizinga, H.P.

N1 - This is also CentER Discussion Paper 2011-132 Pagination: 61

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - A bank’s interest expenses are found to increase with its degree of internationalization as proxied by its share of foreign liabilities in total liabilities or a Herfindahl index of international liability concentration, especially if the bank is performing badly. Our benchmark estimation suggests that an international bank’s cost of funds raised through a foreign subsidiary is between 1.5% and 2.4% higher than the cost of funds for a purely domestic bank, which is a sizeable difference given an overall mean cost of funds of 3.3%. These results are consistent with limited incentives for national authorities to bail out an international bank, but also with an international bank recovery and resolution process that is inefficient. In any event, the operation of the financial safety net appears to be a barrier to cross-border banking.

AB - A bank’s interest expenses are found to increase with its degree of internationalization as proxied by its share of foreign liabilities in total liabilities or a Herfindahl index of international liability concentration, especially if the bank is performing badly. Our benchmark estimation suggests that an international bank’s cost of funds raised through a foreign subsidiary is between 1.5% and 2.4% higher than the cost of funds for a purely domestic bank, which is a sizeable difference given an overall mean cost of funds of 3.3%. These results are consistent with limited incentives for national authorities to bail out an international bank, but also with an international bank recovery and resolution process that is inefficient. In any event, the operation of the financial safety net appears to be a barrier to cross-border banking.

KW - Bank bailouts

KW - International burden sharing

KW - Cross-border banking

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2011-037

T3 - EBC Discussion Paper

BT - Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking?

PB - EBC

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Bertay AC, Demirgüc-Kunt A, Huizinga HP. Is the Financial Safety Net a Barrier to Cross-Border Banking? Tilburg: EBC. 2011. (EBC Discussion Paper).