James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This essay focuses on the philosophical affinity between James and Bergson. Instead of aspiring to a complete summing up of the relation between the two thinkers in an exhaustive “all-form,” it tries to evoke the élan vital of their friendship through “living sympathy,” using Jamesian and Bergsonian metaphors that place the reader at the center of the philosophers’s shared visions. Allowing these metaphors to set the tone and indicate the direction, we avoid the intellectualist pitfall of becoming “myopic ants,” crawling over James’s and Bergson’s philosophies as over a building, “tumbling into every microscopic crack or fissure, finding nothing but inconsistencies, and never suspecting that a centre exists.” James experienced Bergson’s work not as a series of cracks and fissures but as a flow of a “rich river.” In his characteristically generous style he writes to Bergson: “You may be amused at the comparison, but in finishing it I found the same after-taste remaining as after finishing Madame Bovary, such a flavor of persistent euphony, as of a rich river that never foamed or ran thin, but steadily and firmly proceeded with its banks full to the brim.” James and Bergson both invite us to dive into their works rather than “crawl over” them like myopic ants. This means that we have to resist another intellectualist temptation to clean up “the litter with which the world apparently is filled” (PU, 26). In fancying ourselves architects with a vision of things from above, we miss out on the “euphony” of the flux and, if James’s response to Bergson’s Creative Evolution is any indication, the chance to be “rejuvenated.”
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUnderstanding James, Understanding Modernism
PublisherBloomsbury Publishing
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intellectualism
Henri Bergson
Beast
Euphony
Intellectualist
Crack
Rivers
Pitfalls
Reader
Affinity
Sympathy
Friendship
Thinkers
Temptation
Madame Bovary
Inconsistency
Philosophy

Cite this

Slegers, R. (2017). James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors. In Understanding James, Understanding Modernism Bloomsbury Publishing.
Slegers, Rosa. / James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors. Understanding James, Understanding Modernism. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.
@inbook{5a3a539a76c04c37bbb72b63a2e7c2dc,
title = "James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors",
abstract = "This essay focuses on the philosophical affinity between James and Bergson. Instead of aspiring to a complete summing up of the relation between the two thinkers in an exhaustive “all-form,” it tries to evoke the {\'e}lan vital of their friendship through “living sympathy,” using Jamesian and Bergsonian metaphors that place the reader at the center of the philosophers’s shared visions. Allowing these metaphors to set the tone and indicate the direction, we avoid the intellectualist pitfall of becoming “myopic ants,” crawling over James’s and Bergson’s philosophies as over a building, “tumbling into every microscopic crack or fissure, finding nothing but inconsistencies, and never suspecting that a centre exists.” James experienced Bergson’s work not as a series of cracks and fissures but as a flow of a “rich river.” In his characteristically generous style he writes to Bergson: “You may be amused at the comparison, but in finishing it I found the same after-taste remaining as after finishing Madame Bovary, such a flavor of persistent euphony, as of a rich river that never foamed or ran thin, but steadily and firmly proceeded with its banks full to the brim.” James and Bergson both invite us to dive into their works rather than “crawl over” them like myopic ants. This means that we have to resist another intellectualist temptation to clean up “the litter with which the world apparently is filled” (PU, 26). In fancying ourselves architects with a vision of things from above, we miss out on the “euphony” of the flux and, if James’s response to Bergson’s Creative Evolution is any indication, the chance to be “rejuvenated.”",
author = "Rosa Slegers",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Understanding James, Understanding Modernism",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Publishing",

}

Slegers, R 2017, James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors. in Understanding James, Understanding Modernism. Bloomsbury Publishing.

James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors. / Slegers, Rosa.

Understanding James, Understanding Modernism. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors

AU - Slegers, Rosa

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This essay focuses on the philosophical affinity between James and Bergson. Instead of aspiring to a complete summing up of the relation between the two thinkers in an exhaustive “all-form,” it tries to evoke the élan vital of their friendship through “living sympathy,” using Jamesian and Bergsonian metaphors that place the reader at the center of the philosophers’s shared visions. Allowing these metaphors to set the tone and indicate the direction, we avoid the intellectualist pitfall of becoming “myopic ants,” crawling over James’s and Bergson’s philosophies as over a building, “tumbling into every microscopic crack or fissure, finding nothing but inconsistencies, and never suspecting that a centre exists.” James experienced Bergson’s work not as a series of cracks and fissures but as a flow of a “rich river.” In his characteristically generous style he writes to Bergson: “You may be amused at the comparison, but in finishing it I found the same after-taste remaining as after finishing Madame Bovary, such a flavor of persistent euphony, as of a rich river that never foamed or ran thin, but steadily and firmly proceeded with its banks full to the brim.” James and Bergson both invite us to dive into their works rather than “crawl over” them like myopic ants. This means that we have to resist another intellectualist temptation to clean up “the litter with which the world apparently is filled” (PU, 26). In fancying ourselves architects with a vision of things from above, we miss out on the “euphony” of the flux and, if James’s response to Bergson’s Creative Evolution is any indication, the chance to be “rejuvenated.”

AB - This essay focuses on the philosophical affinity between James and Bergson. Instead of aspiring to a complete summing up of the relation between the two thinkers in an exhaustive “all-form,” it tries to evoke the élan vital of their friendship through “living sympathy,” using Jamesian and Bergsonian metaphors that place the reader at the center of the philosophers’s shared visions. Allowing these metaphors to set the tone and indicate the direction, we avoid the intellectualist pitfall of becoming “myopic ants,” crawling over James’s and Bergson’s philosophies as over a building, “tumbling into every microscopic crack or fissure, finding nothing but inconsistencies, and never suspecting that a centre exists.” James experienced Bergson’s work not as a series of cracks and fissures but as a flow of a “rich river.” In his characteristically generous style he writes to Bergson: “You may be amused at the comparison, but in finishing it I found the same after-taste remaining as after finishing Madame Bovary, such a flavor of persistent euphony, as of a rich river that never foamed or ran thin, but steadily and firmly proceeded with its banks full to the brim.” James and Bergson both invite us to dive into their works rather than “crawl over” them like myopic ants. This means that we have to resist another intellectualist temptation to clean up “the litter with which the world apparently is filled” (PU, 26). In fancying ourselves architects with a vision of things from above, we miss out on the “euphony” of the flux and, if James’s response to Bergson’s Creative Evolution is any indication, the chance to be “rejuvenated.”

M3 - Chapter

BT - Understanding James, Understanding Modernism

PB - Bloomsbury Publishing

ER -

Slegers R. James and Bergson: Fighting the Beast Intellectualism with Metaphors. In Understanding James, Understanding Modernism. Bloomsbury Publishing. 2017