Abstract
We analyze the Spence education game in experimental markets.We compare a signaling and a screening variant, and we analyze the e®ect of increasing the number of employers from two to three.In all treatments, there is a strong tendency to separate.More efficient workers invest more often and employers bid higher for workers who have invested.More efficient workers also earn higher wages.Employers' pro¯ts are usually not different from zero.Increased competition leads to higher wages only in the signaling sessions.We ¯nd that workers in the screening sessions invest more often and earn higher wages when there are two employers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Tilburg |
| Publisher | Microeconomics |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Volume | 2003-124 |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Publication series
| Name | CentER Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2003-124 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- labour market
- games
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Job Market Signalling and Screening: An Experimental Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver