Judging Nudging

Answering the Manipulation Objection

Thomas Nys, Bart Engelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Is it ever justified to ‘nudge’ people towards their own health? In this article, we argue that it is. We do so by arguing (1) that nudges are not necessarily – as is commonly thought – manipulative; (2) that even those nudges that are manipulative can be justified, for instance, when they preserve rather than violate people’s autonomy; and (3) that even if nudges can be said to violate some people’s autonomy, they can still be the legitimate outcome of genuinely democratic procedures. While we do not regard nudging as the solution to all or even most public health problems, we argue for a piecemeal approach that carefully considers its benefits and downsides in light of the various values involved and the alternatives at hand.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-214
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume65
Issue number1
Early online date2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

manipulation
autonomy
public health
health
Values

Cite this

Nys, Thomas ; Engelen, Bart. / Judging Nudging : Answering the Manipulation Objection. In: Political Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 65, No. 1. pp. 199-214.
@article{70c05ab1dac745459a82c280efc2d4f5,
title = "Judging Nudging: Answering the Manipulation Objection",
abstract = "Is it ever justified to ‘nudge’ people towards their own health? In this article, we argue that it is. We do so by arguing (1) that nudges are not necessarily – as is commonly thought – manipulative; (2) that even those nudges that are manipulative can be justified, for instance, when they preserve rather than violate people’s autonomy; and (3) that even if nudges can be said to violate some people’s autonomy, they can still be the legitimate outcome of genuinely democratic procedures. While we do not regard nudging as the solution to all or even most public health problems, we argue for a piecemeal approach that carefully considers its benefits and downsides in light of the various values involved and the alternatives at hand.",
author = "Thomas Nys and Bart Engelen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0032321716629487",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "199--214",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Judging Nudging : Answering the Manipulation Objection. / Nys, Thomas; Engelen, Bart.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 65, No. 1, 2017, p. 199-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judging Nudging

T2 - Answering the Manipulation Objection

AU - Nys, Thomas

AU - Engelen, Bart

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Is it ever justified to ‘nudge’ people towards their own health? In this article, we argue that it is. We do so by arguing (1) that nudges are not necessarily – as is commonly thought – manipulative; (2) that even those nudges that are manipulative can be justified, for instance, when they preserve rather than violate people’s autonomy; and (3) that even if nudges can be said to violate some people’s autonomy, they can still be the legitimate outcome of genuinely democratic procedures. While we do not regard nudging as the solution to all or even most public health problems, we argue for a piecemeal approach that carefully considers its benefits and downsides in light of the various values involved and the alternatives at hand.

AB - Is it ever justified to ‘nudge’ people towards their own health? In this article, we argue that it is. We do so by arguing (1) that nudges are not necessarily – as is commonly thought – manipulative; (2) that even those nudges that are manipulative can be justified, for instance, when they preserve rather than violate people’s autonomy; and (3) that even if nudges can be said to violate some people’s autonomy, they can still be the legitimate outcome of genuinely democratic procedures. While we do not regard nudging as the solution to all or even most public health problems, we argue for a piecemeal approach that carefully considers its benefits and downsides in light of the various values involved and the alternatives at hand.

U2 - 10.1177/0032321716629487

DO - 10.1177/0032321716629487

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 199

EP - 214

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 1

ER -