Justice under uncertainty

Elena Cettolin, A. Riedl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Uncertain outcomes are an inevitable feature of policy choices and their public support often depends on their perceived justice. We theoretically and experimentally explore just allocations when recipients are exposed to certainty and uncertainty. In the experiment, uninvolved participants unequivocally choose to allocate resources equally between recipients, when there is certainty. In stark contrast, with uncertainty just allocations are widely dispersed and recipients exposed to higher degrees of uncertainty are allocated less. The observed allocations can be well organized by four different theoretical views of justice, indicating that uninvolved participants differ fundamentally in their views on justice under uncertainty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3739-3759
JournalManagement Science
Volume63
Issue number11
Early online dateSep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Justice
Resources
Public support
Policy choice
Experiment
Perceived justice

Keywords

  • justice
  • uncertainty
  • experiment

Cite this

Cettolin, Elena ; Riedl, A. / Justice under uncertainty. In: Management Science. 2017 ; Vol. 63, No. 11. pp. 3739-3759.
@article{67af1a7d15cb4d0595e007bbf86b921e,
title = "Justice under uncertainty",
abstract = "Uncertain outcomes are an inevitable feature of policy choices and their public support often depends on their perceived justice. We theoretically and experimentally explore just allocations when recipients are exposed to certainty and uncertainty. In the experiment, uninvolved participants unequivocally choose to allocate resources equally between recipients, when there is certainty. In stark contrast, with uncertainty just allocations are widely dispersed and recipients exposed to higher degrees of uncertainty are allocated less. The observed allocations can be well organized by four different theoretical views of justice, indicating that uninvolved participants differ fundamentally in their views on justice under uncertainty.",
keywords = "justice, uncertainty, experiment",
author = "Elena Cettolin and A. Riedl",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.2016.2535",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "3739--3759",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "11",

}

Justice under uncertainty. / Cettolin, Elena; Riedl, A.

In: Management Science, Vol. 63, No. 11, 11.2017, p. 3739-3759.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justice under uncertainty

AU - Cettolin, Elena

AU - Riedl, A.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - Uncertain outcomes are an inevitable feature of policy choices and their public support often depends on their perceived justice. We theoretically and experimentally explore just allocations when recipients are exposed to certainty and uncertainty. In the experiment, uninvolved participants unequivocally choose to allocate resources equally between recipients, when there is certainty. In stark contrast, with uncertainty just allocations are widely dispersed and recipients exposed to higher degrees of uncertainty are allocated less. The observed allocations can be well organized by four different theoretical views of justice, indicating that uninvolved participants differ fundamentally in their views on justice under uncertainty.

AB - Uncertain outcomes are an inevitable feature of policy choices and their public support often depends on their perceived justice. We theoretically and experimentally explore just allocations when recipients are exposed to certainty and uncertainty. In the experiment, uninvolved participants unequivocally choose to allocate resources equally between recipients, when there is certainty. In stark contrast, with uncertainty just allocations are widely dispersed and recipients exposed to higher degrees of uncertainty are allocated less. The observed allocations can be well organized by four different theoretical views of justice, indicating that uninvolved participants differ fundamentally in their views on justice under uncertainty.

KW - justice

KW - uncertainty

KW - experiment

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2535

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2535

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 3739

EP - 3759

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 11

ER -