Kant and the in(ter)dependence of right and virtue

Eric Boot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


This paper aims to clarify how Kant understood the relation between the two spheres of morals (Right and virtue). Did he, as O’Neill claims, acknowledge the need for civic virtue as necessary for maintaining a liberal state? Or did he take the opposite view (shared by many contemporary liberals) that citizens’ virtuous dispositions are irrelevant and that all that matters is the justice of institutions? Though The Metaphysics of Morals gives the impression that Kant shared the latter position, I will argue that, in fact, Kant held a position somewhere between the Rousseauian view (which O’Neill believes Kant endorsed) that the essential difficulty of politics concerns the cultivation of civic duty in citizens, and contemporary liberals’ exclusive focus on the justice of institutions, by arguing that it is the laws themselves that foster respect for the laws. In short, Kant views virtue as the felicitous by-product of legality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-422
Number of pages28
JournalEthic@. An International Journal for Moral Philosophy
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Kant and the in(ter)dependence of right and virtue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this