Keep the wolf from the door

How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes?

D.P.J. Kuijper, M. Churski, Arie Trouwborst, M. Heurich, C. Smit, G.I.H. Kerley, J.P.G.M. Cromsigt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The recolonization of wolves in European human-dominated landscapes poses a conservation challenge to protect this species and manage conflicts. The question of how humans can co-exist with large carnivores often triggers strong emotions. Here we provide an objective, science-based discussion on possible management approaches. Using existing knowledge on large carnivore management from Europe and other parts of the globe, we develop four potential wolf management scenarios; 1) population control, 2) protection and compensation, 3) fencing, 4) managing behaviour of wolf and man. For each scenario, we discuss its impact on wolf ecology, its prospects of reducing wolf-human conflicts and how it relates to current European legislation. Population control and fencing of local wolf populations are problematic because of their ecological impacts and conflicts with European legislation. In contrast, a no-interference approach does not have these problems but will likely increase human-wolf conflicts. Despite the large challenges in European, human-dominated landscapes, we argue that wolf management must focus on strengthening the separation between humans and wolves by influencing behaviour of wolves and humans on a fine spatio-temporal scale to prevent and reduce conflicts. As separation also demands a sufficiently large wild prey base, we urge restoring natural ungulate populations, to reduce human-wolf conflicts. Mutual avoidance provides the key to success, and is critical to avoid creating the conditions for reinstating wolf persecution as the default policy in Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-111
Number of pages10
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume235
Issue numberJuly 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

carnivore
legislation
ecological impact
recolonization
ungulate
conflict
Europe
ecology
science
policy

Cite this

Kuijper, D. P. J., Churski, M., Trouwborst, A., Heurich, M., Smit, C., Kerley, G. I. H., & Cromsigt, J. P. G. M. (2019). Keep the wolf from the door: How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes? Biological Conservation, 235(July 2019), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.004
Kuijper, D.P.J. ; Churski, M. ; Trouwborst, Arie ; Heurich, M. ; Smit, C. ; Kerley, G.I.H. ; Cromsigt, J.P.G.M. / Keep the wolf from the door : How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes?. In: Biological Conservation. 2019 ; Vol. 235, No. July 2019. pp. 102-111.
@article{4fe3f3bf3ae84974bd464021f6bb2882,
title = "Keep the wolf from the door: How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes?",
abstract = "The recolonization of wolves in European human-dominated landscapes poses a conservation challenge to protect this species and manage conflicts. The question of how humans can co-exist with large carnivores often triggers strong emotions. Here we provide an objective, science-based discussion on possible management approaches. Using existing knowledge on large carnivore management from Europe and other parts of the globe, we develop four potential wolf management scenarios; 1) population control, 2) protection and compensation, 3) fencing, 4) managing behaviour of wolf and man. For each scenario, we discuss its impact on wolf ecology, its prospects of reducing wolf-human conflicts and how it relates to current European legislation. Population control and fencing of local wolf populations are problematic because of their ecological impacts and conflicts with European legislation. In contrast, a no-interference approach does not have these problems but will likely increase human-wolf conflicts. Despite the large challenges in European, human-dominated landscapes, we argue that wolf management must focus on strengthening the separation between humans and wolves by influencing behaviour of wolves and humans on a fine spatio-temporal scale to prevent and reduce conflicts. As separation also demands a sufficiently large wild prey base, we urge restoring natural ungulate populations, to reduce human-wolf conflicts. Mutual avoidance provides the key to success, and is critical to avoid creating the conditions for reinstating wolf persecution as the default policy in Europe.",
author = "D.P.J. Kuijper and M. Churski and Arie Trouwborst and M. Heurich and C. Smit and G.I.H. Kerley and J.P.G.M. Cromsigt",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.004",
language = "English",
volume = "235",
pages = "102--111",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "July 2019",

}

Kuijper, DPJ, Churski, M, Trouwborst, A, Heurich, M, Smit, C, Kerley, GIH & Cromsigt, JPGM 2019, 'Keep the wolf from the door: How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes?', Biological Conservation, vol. 235, no. July 2019, pp. 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.004

Keep the wolf from the door : How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes? / Kuijper, D.P.J.; Churski, M.; Trouwborst, Arie; Heurich, M.; Smit, C.; Kerley, G.I.H.; Cromsigt, J.P.G.M.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 235, No. July 2019, 2019, p. 102-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Keep the wolf from the door

T2 - How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes?

AU - Kuijper, D.P.J.

AU - Churski, M.

AU - Trouwborst, Arie

AU - Heurich, M.

AU - Smit, C.

AU - Kerley, G.I.H.

AU - Cromsigt, J.P.G.M.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The recolonization of wolves in European human-dominated landscapes poses a conservation challenge to protect this species and manage conflicts. The question of how humans can co-exist with large carnivores often triggers strong emotions. Here we provide an objective, science-based discussion on possible management approaches. Using existing knowledge on large carnivore management from Europe and other parts of the globe, we develop four potential wolf management scenarios; 1) population control, 2) protection and compensation, 3) fencing, 4) managing behaviour of wolf and man. For each scenario, we discuss its impact on wolf ecology, its prospects of reducing wolf-human conflicts and how it relates to current European legislation. Population control and fencing of local wolf populations are problematic because of their ecological impacts and conflicts with European legislation. In contrast, a no-interference approach does not have these problems but will likely increase human-wolf conflicts. Despite the large challenges in European, human-dominated landscapes, we argue that wolf management must focus on strengthening the separation between humans and wolves by influencing behaviour of wolves and humans on a fine spatio-temporal scale to prevent and reduce conflicts. As separation also demands a sufficiently large wild prey base, we urge restoring natural ungulate populations, to reduce human-wolf conflicts. Mutual avoidance provides the key to success, and is critical to avoid creating the conditions for reinstating wolf persecution as the default policy in Europe.

AB - The recolonization of wolves in European human-dominated landscapes poses a conservation challenge to protect this species and manage conflicts. The question of how humans can co-exist with large carnivores often triggers strong emotions. Here we provide an objective, science-based discussion on possible management approaches. Using existing knowledge on large carnivore management from Europe and other parts of the globe, we develop four potential wolf management scenarios; 1) population control, 2) protection and compensation, 3) fencing, 4) managing behaviour of wolf and man. For each scenario, we discuss its impact on wolf ecology, its prospects of reducing wolf-human conflicts and how it relates to current European legislation. Population control and fencing of local wolf populations are problematic because of their ecological impacts and conflicts with European legislation. In contrast, a no-interference approach does not have these problems but will likely increase human-wolf conflicts. Despite the large challenges in European, human-dominated landscapes, we argue that wolf management must focus on strengthening the separation between humans and wolves by influencing behaviour of wolves and humans on a fine spatio-temporal scale to prevent and reduce conflicts. As separation also demands a sufficiently large wild prey base, we urge restoring natural ungulate populations, to reduce human-wolf conflicts. Mutual avoidance provides the key to success, and is critical to avoid creating the conditions for reinstating wolf persecution as the default policy in Europe.

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.004

M3 - Article

VL - 235

SP - 102

EP - 111

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - July 2019

ER -