Keeping secrets from parents

On galloping horses, prancing ponies and pink unicorns

Tom Frijns*, L. Keijsers, Catrin Finkenauer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We identify the need for a new wave of research on adolescent secrecy in their relationship with parents that relinquishes the focus on the nomothetic objective of finding general principles. This third wave builds on novel insights on three fallacies committed in previous waves of research: (1) between-person effects do not necessarily provide insights into within-family processes (the ecological fallacy), (2) within-family processes are not necessarily homogeneous across adolescents and families (the one size fits all fallacy), and (3) longer-term effects are not necessarily identical to short-term processes (the galloping horse fallacy). This approach promises to provide us with a more person-specific understanding of adolescent secrecy from parents, which enables more tailored insights as to when and for whom secrecy is bad versus good.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-54
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Horses
Parents
Legendary Creatures

Cite this

@article{4a9afab934d74daba5fc00863f460a19,
title = "Keeping secrets from parents: On galloping horses, prancing ponies and pink unicorns",
abstract = "We identify the need for a new wave of research on adolescent secrecy in their relationship with parents that relinquishes the focus on the nomothetic objective of finding general principles. This third wave builds on novel insights on three fallacies committed in previous waves of research: (1) between-person effects do not necessarily provide insights into within-family processes (the ecological fallacy), (2) within-family processes are not necessarily homogeneous across adolescents and families (the one size fits all fallacy), and (3) longer-term effects are not necessarily identical to short-term processes (the galloping horse fallacy). This approach promises to provide us with a more person-specific understanding of adolescent secrecy from parents, which enables more tailored insights as to when and for whom secrecy is bad versus good.",
author = "Tom Frijns and L. Keijsers and Catrin Finkenauer",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.041",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "49--54",
journal = "Current Opinion in Psychology",
issn = "2352-1546",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Keeping secrets from parents : On galloping horses, prancing ponies and pink unicorns. / Frijns, Tom; Keijsers, L.; Finkenauer, Catrin.

In: Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 31, 2020, p. 49-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Keeping secrets from parents

T2 - On galloping horses, prancing ponies and pink unicorns

AU - Frijns, Tom

AU - Keijsers, L.

AU - Finkenauer, Catrin

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - We identify the need for a new wave of research on adolescent secrecy in their relationship with parents that relinquishes the focus on the nomothetic objective of finding general principles. This third wave builds on novel insights on three fallacies committed in previous waves of research: (1) between-person effects do not necessarily provide insights into within-family processes (the ecological fallacy), (2) within-family processes are not necessarily homogeneous across adolescents and families (the one size fits all fallacy), and (3) longer-term effects are not necessarily identical to short-term processes (the galloping horse fallacy). This approach promises to provide us with a more person-specific understanding of adolescent secrecy from parents, which enables more tailored insights as to when and for whom secrecy is bad versus good.

AB - We identify the need for a new wave of research on adolescent secrecy in their relationship with parents that relinquishes the focus on the nomothetic objective of finding general principles. This third wave builds on novel insights on three fallacies committed in previous waves of research: (1) between-person effects do not necessarily provide insights into within-family processes (the ecological fallacy), (2) within-family processes are not necessarily homogeneous across adolescents and families (the one size fits all fallacy), and (3) longer-term effects are not necessarily identical to short-term processes (the galloping horse fallacy). This approach promises to provide us with a more person-specific understanding of adolescent secrecy from parents, which enables more tailored insights as to when and for whom secrecy is bad versus good.

U2 - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.041

DO - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.041

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 49

EP - 54

JO - Current Opinion in Psychology

JF - Current Opinion in Psychology

SN - 2352-1546

ER -