Kinds versus continua: A review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs

D. Borsboom, M. Rhemtulla, A.O.J. Cramer, Han L. J. van der Maas, M. Scheffer, C.V. Dolan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

90 Citations (Scopus)


The question of whether psychopathology constructs are discrete kinds or continuous dimensions represents an important issue in clinical psychology and psychiatry. The present paper reviews psychometric modelling approaches that can be used to investigate this question through the application of statistical models. The relation between constructs and indicator variables in models with categorical and continuous latent variables is discussed, as are techniques specifically designed to address the distinction between latent categories as opposed to continua (taxometrics). In addition, we examine latent variable models that allow latent structures to have both continuous and categorical characteristics, such as factor mixture models and grade-of-membership models. Finally, we discuss recent alternative approaches based on network analysis and dynamical systems theory, which entail that the structure of constructs may be continuous for some individuals but categorical for others. Our evaluation of the psychometric literature shows that the kinds-continua distinction is considerably more subtle than is often presupposed in research; in particular, the hypotheses of kinds and continua are not mutually exclusive or exhaustive. We discuss opportunities to go beyond current research on the issue by using dynamical systems models, intra-individual time series and experimental manipulations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1567-1579
JournalPsychological Medicine: A Journal for Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes


  • Journal Article


Dive into the research topics of 'Kinds versus continua: A review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this