Projects per year
Abstract
This paper examines the securitisation of peaceful protest across Europe, where
state authorities, prosecutors, courts, and media increasingly reframe activists as
extremists or terrorists. This labelling legitimises exceptional measures: France’s
attempted dissolution of Les Soulèvements de la Terre, Spain’s classification of
Extinction Rebellion under “national terrorism,” German investigations of Letzte
Generation under organised-crime and terrorism provisions, Dutch airport bans
on climate activists, UK referrals of protesters under the Prevent programme, or
Switzerland’s use of new police powers against climate groups. Beyond discursive
stigma, counterterrorism frameworks enable intrusive practices such as biometric
identification, predictive watchlists, and intelligence databases originally designed
for violent threats. These measures blur the line between dissent and extremism,
lowering thresholds for repression and reshaping activists into suspect communities.
The analysis, drawing on European legal standards and targeted case studies, shows
how this trend undermines rights to privacy, expression, and assembly protected
under the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter. By extend-
ing extraordinary state powers to protest, European governments risk normalising
surveillance and delegitimising civic engagement. The paper calls for urgent safe-
guards to curb this trend and preserve the legitimacy of protest as a cornerstone of
European democracy.
state authorities, prosecutors, courts, and media increasingly reframe activists as
extremists or terrorists. This labelling legitimises exceptional measures: France’s
attempted dissolution of Les Soulèvements de la Terre, Spain’s classification of
Extinction Rebellion under “national terrorism,” German investigations of Letzte
Generation under organised-crime and terrorism provisions, Dutch airport bans
on climate activists, UK referrals of protesters under the Prevent programme, or
Switzerland’s use of new police powers against climate groups. Beyond discursive
stigma, counterterrorism frameworks enable intrusive practices such as biometric
identification, predictive watchlists, and intelligence databases originally designed
for violent threats. These measures blur the line between dissent and extremism,
lowering thresholds for repression and reshaping activists into suspect communities.
The analysis, drawing on European legal standards and targeted case studies, shows
how this trend undermines rights to privacy, expression, and assembly protected
under the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter. By extend-
ing extraordinary state powers to protest, European governments risk normalising
surveillance and delegitimising civic engagement. The paper calls for urgent safe-
guards to curb this trend and preserve the legitimacy of protest as a cornerstone of
European democracy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 37 |
| Journal | International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Labelling Activists as Terrorists: The Securitisation of Peaceful Protest in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
The Right to Help Others: Towards a New Legal Defense to the Criminalization of Activism
Dejean de la Bâtie, A. (Principal Investigator)
1/01/26 → 31/12/30
Project: Research project