Language and Emotion - A Foosball Study

The Influence of Affective State on Language Production in a Competitive Setting

Nadine Braun*, Martijn Goudbeek, Emiel Krahmer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Our affective state is influenced by daily events and our interactions with other people, which, in turn, can affect the way we communicate. In two studies, we investigated the influence of experiencing success or failure in a foosball (table soccer) game on participants' affective state and how this in turn influenced the way they report on the game itself. Winning or losing a match can further influence how they view their own team (compared to the opponent), which may also impact how they report on the match. In Study 1, we explored this by having participants play foosball matches in two dyads. They subsequently reported their affective state and team cohesiveness, and wrote two match reports, one from their own and one from their opponent's perspective. Indeed, while the game generally improved participants' moods, especially winning made them happier and more excited and losing made them more dejected, both in questionnaires and in the reports, which were analyzed with a word count tool. Study 2 experimentally investigated the effect of affective state on focus and distancing behavior. After the match, participants chose between preselected sentences (from Study 1) that differed in focus (mentioning the own vs. other team) or distancing (using we vs. the team name). Results show an effect for focus: winning participants preferred sentences that described their own performance positively while losing participants chose sentences that praised their opponent over negative sentences about themselves. No effect of distancing in pronoun use was found: winning and losing participants equally preferred the use of we vs. the use of their own team name. We discuss the implications of our findings with regard to models of language production, the self-serving bias, and the use of games to induce emotions in a natural way.

Original languageEnglish
Article number0217419
Pages (from-to)e0217419
Number of pages29
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2019

Keywords

  • REFLECTED GLORY
  • GROUP SUCCESS
  • FAILURE
  • BASKING
  • BENEFITS
  • WORDS
  • MOOD
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • ATTRIBUTION
  • DEPRESSION

Cite this

@article{949e10a2ac414f1b95e2ac8a8639cbaa,
title = "Language and Emotion - A Foosball Study: The Influence of Affective State on Language Production in a Competitive Setting",
abstract = "Our affective state is influenced by daily events and our interactions with other people, which, in turn, can affect the way we communicate. In two studies, we investigated the influence of experiencing success or failure in a foosball (table soccer) game on participants' affective state and how this in turn influenced the way they report on the game itself. Winning or losing a match can further influence how they view their own team (compared to the opponent), which may also impact how they report on the match. In Study 1, we explored this by having participants play foosball matches in two dyads. They subsequently reported their affective state and team cohesiveness, and wrote two match reports, one from their own and one from their opponent's perspective. Indeed, while the game generally improved participants' moods, especially winning made them happier and more excited and losing made them more dejected, both in questionnaires and in the reports, which were analyzed with a word count tool. Study 2 experimentally investigated the effect of affective state on focus and distancing behavior. After the match, participants chose between preselected sentences (from Study 1) that differed in focus (mentioning the own vs. other team) or distancing (using we vs. the team name). Results show an effect for focus: winning participants preferred sentences that described their own performance positively while losing participants chose sentences that praised their opponent over negative sentences about themselves. No effect of distancing in pronoun use was found: winning and losing participants equally preferred the use of we vs. the use of their own team name. We discuss the implications of our findings with regard to models of language production, the self-serving bias, and the use of games to induce emotions in a natural way.",
keywords = "REFLECTED GLORY, GROUP SUCCESS, FAILURE, BASKING, BENEFITS, WORDS, MOOD, CONSEQUENCES, ATTRIBUTION, DEPRESSION",
author = "Nadine Braun and Martijn Goudbeek and Emiel Krahmer",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0217419",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "e0217419",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "5",

}

Language and Emotion - A Foosball Study : The Influence of Affective State on Language Production in a Competitive Setting. / Braun, Nadine; Goudbeek, Martijn; Krahmer, Emiel.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 5, 0217419, 24.05.2019, p. e0217419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Language and Emotion - A Foosball Study

T2 - The Influence of Affective State on Language Production in a Competitive Setting

AU - Braun, Nadine

AU - Goudbeek, Martijn

AU - Krahmer, Emiel

PY - 2019/5/24

Y1 - 2019/5/24

N2 - Our affective state is influenced by daily events and our interactions with other people, which, in turn, can affect the way we communicate. In two studies, we investigated the influence of experiencing success or failure in a foosball (table soccer) game on participants' affective state and how this in turn influenced the way they report on the game itself. Winning or losing a match can further influence how they view their own team (compared to the opponent), which may also impact how they report on the match. In Study 1, we explored this by having participants play foosball matches in two dyads. They subsequently reported their affective state and team cohesiveness, and wrote two match reports, one from their own and one from their opponent's perspective. Indeed, while the game generally improved participants' moods, especially winning made them happier and more excited and losing made them more dejected, both in questionnaires and in the reports, which were analyzed with a word count tool. Study 2 experimentally investigated the effect of affective state on focus and distancing behavior. After the match, participants chose between preselected sentences (from Study 1) that differed in focus (mentioning the own vs. other team) or distancing (using we vs. the team name). Results show an effect for focus: winning participants preferred sentences that described their own performance positively while losing participants chose sentences that praised their opponent over negative sentences about themselves. No effect of distancing in pronoun use was found: winning and losing participants equally preferred the use of we vs. the use of their own team name. We discuss the implications of our findings with regard to models of language production, the self-serving bias, and the use of games to induce emotions in a natural way.

AB - Our affective state is influenced by daily events and our interactions with other people, which, in turn, can affect the way we communicate. In two studies, we investigated the influence of experiencing success or failure in a foosball (table soccer) game on participants' affective state and how this in turn influenced the way they report on the game itself. Winning or losing a match can further influence how they view their own team (compared to the opponent), which may also impact how they report on the match. In Study 1, we explored this by having participants play foosball matches in two dyads. They subsequently reported their affective state and team cohesiveness, and wrote two match reports, one from their own and one from their opponent's perspective. Indeed, while the game generally improved participants' moods, especially winning made them happier and more excited and losing made them more dejected, both in questionnaires and in the reports, which were analyzed with a word count tool. Study 2 experimentally investigated the effect of affective state on focus and distancing behavior. After the match, participants chose between preselected sentences (from Study 1) that differed in focus (mentioning the own vs. other team) or distancing (using we vs. the team name). Results show an effect for focus: winning participants preferred sentences that described their own performance positively while losing participants chose sentences that praised their opponent over negative sentences about themselves. No effect of distancing in pronoun use was found: winning and losing participants equally preferred the use of we vs. the use of their own team name. We discuss the implications of our findings with regard to models of language production, the self-serving bias, and the use of games to induce emotions in a natural way.

KW - REFLECTED GLORY

KW - GROUP SUCCESS

KW - FAILURE

KW - BASKING

KW - BENEFITS

KW - WORDS

KW - MOOD

KW - CONSEQUENCES

KW - ATTRIBUTION

KW - DEPRESSION

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0217419

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0217419

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - e0217419

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

M1 - 0217419

ER -