Large-scale cross-societal examination of real- and minimal-group biases

X. Yang*, J. Schulz, K. Schmidt, A. Kenny, G. Pfuhl, B. Jaeger, Y. Dunham*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paperScientific

57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Biases in favor of culturally prevalent social ingroups are ubiquitous, but random assignment to arbitrary experimentally created social groups is also sufficient to create ingroup biases (i.e., the minimal group effect; MGE). The extent to which ingroup bias arises from specific social contexts versus more general psychological tendencies remains unclear. This registered report focuses on three questions. First, how culturally prevalent is the MGE? Second, how do critical cultural and individual factors moderate its strength? Third, does the MGE meaningfully relate to culturally salient real-world ingroup biases? We compare the MGE to bias in favor of a family member (first cousin) and a national ingroup member. We propose to recruit a sample of > 200 participants in each of > 50 nations to examine these questions and advance our understanding of the psychological foundations and cultural prevalence of ingroup bias.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPsyArXiv Preprints
Number of pages41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Large-scale cross-societal examination of real- and minimal-group biases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this