TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent Markov latent trait analysis for exploring measurement model changes in intensive longitudinal data
AU - Vogelsmeier, Leonie V.D.E.
AU - Vermunt, Jeroen K.
AU - Keijsers, L.
AU - De Roover, Kim
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research leading to the results reported in this paper was sponsored by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [Research Talent grant 406.17.517; Veni grant 451.16.004; Vidi grant 452.17.011]. Funding for data collection came from Utrecht University, Dynamics of Youth seed project, awarded to Loes Keijsers, Manon Hillegers et al.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Drawing inferences about dynamics of psychological constructs from intensive longitudinal data requires the measurement model (MM)-indicating how items relate to constructs-to be invariant across subjects and time-points. When assessing subjects in their daily life, however, there may be multiple MMs, for instance, because subjects differ in their item interpretation or because the response style of (some) subjects changes over time. The recently proposed "latent Markov factor analysis" (LMFA) evaluates (violations of) measurement invariance by classifying observations into latent "states" according to the MM underlying these observations such that MMs differ between states but are invariant within one state. However, LMFA is limited to normally distributed continuous data and estimates may be inaccurate when applying the method to ordinal data (e.g., from Likert items) with skewed responses or few response categories. To enable researchers and health professionals with ordinal data to evaluate measurement invariance, we present "latent Markov latent trait analysis" (LMLTA), which builds upon LMFA but treats responses as ordinal. Our application shows differences in MMs of adolescents' affective well-being in different social contexts, highlighting the importance of studying measurement invariance for drawing accurate inferences for psychological science and practice and for further understanding dynamics of psychological constructs.
AB - Drawing inferences about dynamics of psychological constructs from intensive longitudinal data requires the measurement model (MM)-indicating how items relate to constructs-to be invariant across subjects and time-points. When assessing subjects in their daily life, however, there may be multiple MMs, for instance, because subjects differ in their item interpretation or because the response style of (some) subjects changes over time. The recently proposed "latent Markov factor analysis" (LMFA) evaluates (violations of) measurement invariance by classifying observations into latent "states" according to the MM underlying these observations such that MMs differ between states but are invariant within one state. However, LMFA is limited to normally distributed continuous data and estimates may be inaccurate when applying the method to ordinal data (e.g., from Likert items) with skewed responses or few response categories. To enable researchers and health professionals with ordinal data to evaluate measurement invariance, we present "latent Markov latent trait analysis" (LMLTA), which builds upon LMFA but treats responses as ordinal. Our application shows differences in MMs of adolescents' affective well-being in different social contexts, highlighting the importance of studying measurement invariance for drawing accurate inferences for psychological science and practice and for further understanding dynamics of psychological constructs.
KW - CONTEXT
KW - CONTINUOUS-TIME
KW - DYNAMICS
KW - EQUIVALENCE
KW - ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
KW - STATES
KW - VARIABLES
KW - experience sampling
KW - item response theory
KW - latent Markov modeling
KW - latent trait analysis
KW - measurement invariance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097377401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0163278720976762
DO - 10.1177/0163278720976762
M3 - Article
SN - 1552-3918
VL - 44
SP - 61
EP - 76
JO - Evaluation & the Health Professions
JF - Evaluation & the Health Professions
IS - 1
ER -