Law and Popular Culture: International Perspectives

K.J. Brown (Editor), Michael Asimow (Editor), David Ray Papke (Editor)

    Research output: Book/ReportBook editingScientific

    Abstract

    Commentators have noted the extraordinary impact of popular culture on legal practice, courtroom proceedings, police departments, and government as a whole, and it is no exaggeration to say that most people derive their basic understanding of law from cultural products. Movies, television programs, fiction, children’s literature, online games, and the mass media typically influence attitudes and impressions regarding law and legal institutions more than law and legal institutions themselves. Law and Popular Culture: International Perspectives enhances the appreciation of the interaction between popular culture and law by underscoring this interaction’s multinational and international features. Two dozen authors from nine countries invite readers to consider the role of law-related popular culture in a broad range of nations, socio-political contexts, and educational environments. Even more importantly, selected contributors explore the global transmission and reception of law-related cultural products and, in particular, the influence of assorted works and media across national borders and cultural boundaries. The circulation and consumption of law-related popular culture are increasing as channels of mass media become more complex and as globalization runs its uncertain course. Law and Popular Culture: International Perspectives adds to the critical understanding of the worldwide interaction of popular culture and law and encourages reflection on the wider implications of this mutual influence across both time and geography.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationNewcastle-upon-Tyne
    PublisherCambridge Scholars Publishing
    Number of pages425
    ISBN (Print)9781443858106
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Law and Popular Culture: International Perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this