Learning not to underestimate

Understanding the dynamics of women’s underestimation in groups

Nicoleta Meslec, Ishani Aggarwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to isolate a new mechanism (i.e. underestimation judgments) through which gender (percentage of women in a group in particular) influences group synergy, or the extent to which groups are able to perform better than their composing members. Second, it aims to explore further the extent to which underestimation judgments are prone to change and adjustment as a result of participating in social contexts, such as groups.

Design/methodology/approach
The sample consisted of 278 student participants (161 women), nested within 66 groups. Participants performed a series of cognitive tasks with correct answers and had to rate how confident they were in the answers given.

Findings
Gender composition in terms of percentage of women is positively related to underestimation within groups and this negatively affects group synergy. The data also show that women underestimate less or improve the accuracy of their performance self-evaluation judgments after group interaction, thereby highlighting a factor (group experience) that helps women gain greater accuracy about their performance.

Research limitations/implications
Further research could explore the extent to which underestimation judgments are present in various organizational contexts and the extent to which they are prone to change.

Practical implications
Organizations and universities are invited to reflect on the relevance of self-beliefs (and underestimation in particular) on the accomplishment of cognitive tasks. Practices and policies should be geared toward the enhancement of self-knowledge accuracy, with a particular focus on the female population.

Originality/value
This paper identifies a new mechanism through which gender influences group synergy: underestimation judgments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-395
JournalTeam Performance Management
Volume24
Issue number7/8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Students
Chemical analysis
Synergy
Group interaction
Organizational context
Social context
Enhancement
Factors
Design methodology

Cite this

@article{9cb33aa6051746f7b623b3feae38ff74,
title = "Learning not to underestimate: Understanding the dynamics of women’s underestimation in groups",
abstract = "PurposeThe purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to isolate a new mechanism (i.e. underestimation judgments) through which gender (percentage of women in a group in particular) influences group synergy, or the extent to which groups are able to perform better than their composing members. Second, it aims to explore further the extent to which underestimation judgments are prone to change and adjustment as a result of participating in social contexts, such as groups.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 278 student participants (161 women), nested within 66 groups. Participants performed a series of cognitive tasks with correct answers and had to rate how confident they were in the answers given.FindingsGender composition in terms of percentage of women is positively related to underestimation within groups and this negatively affects group synergy. The data also show that women underestimate less or improve the accuracy of their performance self-evaluation judgments after group interaction, thereby highlighting a factor (group experience) that helps women gain greater accuracy about their performance.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research could explore the extent to which underestimation judgments are present in various organizational contexts and the extent to which they are prone to change.Practical implicationsOrganizations and universities are invited to reflect on the relevance of self-beliefs (and underestimation in particular) on the accomplishment of cognitive tasks. Practices and policies should be geared toward the enhancement of self-knowledge accuracy, with a particular focus on the female population.Originality/valueThis paper identifies a new mechanism through which gender influences group synergy: underestimation judgments.",
author = "Nicoleta Meslec and Ishani Aggarwal",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1108/TPM-01-2018-0006",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "380--395",
journal = "Team Performance Management",
issn = "1352-7592",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7/8",

}

Learning not to underestimate : Understanding the dynamics of women’s underestimation in groups. / Meslec, Nicoleta; Aggarwal, Ishani.

In: Team Performance Management, Vol. 24, No. 7/8, 2018, p. 380-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning not to underestimate

T2 - Understanding the dynamics of women’s underestimation in groups

AU - Meslec, Nicoleta

AU - Aggarwal, Ishani

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to isolate a new mechanism (i.e. underestimation judgments) through which gender (percentage of women in a group in particular) influences group synergy, or the extent to which groups are able to perform better than their composing members. Second, it aims to explore further the extent to which underestimation judgments are prone to change and adjustment as a result of participating in social contexts, such as groups.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 278 student participants (161 women), nested within 66 groups. Participants performed a series of cognitive tasks with correct answers and had to rate how confident they were in the answers given.FindingsGender composition in terms of percentage of women is positively related to underestimation within groups and this negatively affects group synergy. The data also show that women underestimate less or improve the accuracy of their performance self-evaluation judgments after group interaction, thereby highlighting a factor (group experience) that helps women gain greater accuracy about their performance.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research could explore the extent to which underestimation judgments are present in various organizational contexts and the extent to which they are prone to change.Practical implicationsOrganizations and universities are invited to reflect on the relevance of self-beliefs (and underestimation in particular) on the accomplishment of cognitive tasks. Practices and policies should be geared toward the enhancement of self-knowledge accuracy, with a particular focus on the female population.Originality/valueThis paper identifies a new mechanism through which gender influences group synergy: underestimation judgments.

AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to isolate a new mechanism (i.e. underestimation judgments) through which gender (percentage of women in a group in particular) influences group synergy, or the extent to which groups are able to perform better than their composing members. Second, it aims to explore further the extent to which underestimation judgments are prone to change and adjustment as a result of participating in social contexts, such as groups.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 278 student participants (161 women), nested within 66 groups. Participants performed a series of cognitive tasks with correct answers and had to rate how confident they were in the answers given.FindingsGender composition in terms of percentage of women is positively related to underestimation within groups and this negatively affects group synergy. The data also show that women underestimate less or improve the accuracy of their performance self-evaluation judgments after group interaction, thereby highlighting a factor (group experience) that helps women gain greater accuracy about their performance.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research could explore the extent to which underestimation judgments are present in various organizational contexts and the extent to which they are prone to change.Practical implicationsOrganizations and universities are invited to reflect on the relevance of self-beliefs (and underestimation in particular) on the accomplishment of cognitive tasks. Practices and policies should be geared toward the enhancement of self-knowledge accuracy, with a particular focus on the female population.Originality/valueThis paper identifies a new mechanism through which gender influences group synergy: underestimation judgments.

U2 - 10.1108/TPM-01-2018-0006

DO - 10.1108/TPM-01-2018-0006

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 380

EP - 395

JO - Team Performance Management

JF - Team Performance Management

SN - 1352-7592

IS - 7/8

ER -