Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading

Alexandra Aragao; Charles-Hubert Born; Eleonora Ciscato; An Cliquet; Kris Decleer; Harm Dotinga; Floor Fleurke; Francesca Leucci; Volkel Mauerhofer; Matilde Meertens; Ana Mendes; Moritz Reese; Hendrik Schoukens; Arie Trouwborst; Geert van Hoorick; Jonathan Verschuuren

Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading

Alexandra Aragao, Charles-Hubert Born, Eleonora Ciscato, An Cliquet^*, Kris Decleer, Harm Dotinga, Floor Fleurke, Francesca Leucci, Volkel Mauerhofer, Matilde Meertens, Ana Mendes, Moritz Reese, Hendrik Schoukens, Arie Trouwborst, Geert van Hoorick, Jonathan Verschuuren

^*Corresponding author for this work

Public Law & Governance

Research output: Book/Report › Report

240 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In their letter of 26 June 2023 Copa*Cogeca asked the members of the European Parliament’s Committee on Environment to reject the Nature Restoration Law proposal. They based their arguments for this rejection on what they considered as ‘red line’ issues, which makes the law proposal unacceptable to them.
As Legal Working Group (LWG) from SERE , we analysed these ‘red line’ issues and we concluded that their red line objections against the Nature Restoration Law proposal cannot withstand legal scrutiny. Many of their concerns are already present in the Commission proposal and are further addressed in the Swedish presidency compromise proposal. Further weakening of the Nature Restoration Law is against existing EU legislation.

Original language	English
Publisher	Society for Ecological Restoration
Number of pages	6
Publication status	Published - 6 Jul 2023

Keywords

nature conservation law
restoration
European Law
agriculture
Habitats Directive

Access to Document

legal assessment of Copa Cogeca objections Final published version, 235 KBLicence: Unspecified

https://serchapter2018.wpenginepowered.com/europe/files/2023/07/legal-assessment-of-Copa-Cogeca-objections-.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

Aragao, A., Born, C.-H., Ciscato, E., Cliquet, A., Decleer, K., Dotinga, H., Fleurke, F., Leucci, F., Mauerhofer, V., Meertens, M., Mendes, A., Reese, M., Schoukens, H., Trouwborst, A., van Hoorick, G., & Verschuuren, J. (2023). Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading. Society for Ecological Restoration. https://serchapter2018.wpenginepowered.com/europe/files/2023/07/legal-assessment-of-Copa-Cogeca-objections-.pdf

@book{52c6610ab53448ae86b9e51cf76d80eb,

title = "Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading",

abstract = "In their letter of 26 June 2023 Copa*Cogeca asked the members of the European Parliament{\textquoteright}s Committee on Environment to reject the Nature Restoration Law proposal. They based their arguments for this rejection on what they considered as {\textquoteleft}red line{\textquoteright} issues, which makes the law proposal unacceptable to them.As Legal Working Group (LWG) from SERE , we analysed these {\textquoteleft}red line{\textquoteright} issues and we concluded that their red line objections against the Nature Restoration Law proposal cannot withstand legal scrutiny. Many of their concerns are already present in the Commission proposal and are further addressed in the Swedish presidency compromise proposal. Further weakening of the Nature Restoration Law is against existing EU legislation.",

keywords = "nature conservation law, restoration, European Law, agriculture, Habitats Directive",

author = "Alexandra Aragao and Charles-Hubert Born and Eleonora Ciscato and An Cliquet and Kris Decleer and Harm Dotinga and Floor Fleurke and Francesca Leucci and Volkel Mauerhofer and Matilde Meertens and Ana Mendes and Moritz Reese and Hendrik Schoukens and Arie Trouwborst and {van Hoorick}, Geert and Jonathan Verschuuren",

year = "2023",

month = jul,

day = "6",

language = "English",

publisher = "Society for Ecological Restoration",

}

Aragao, A, Born, C-H, Ciscato, E, Cliquet, A, Decleer, K, Dotinga, H, Fleurke, F, Leucci, F, Mauerhofer, V, Meertens, M, Mendes, A, Reese, M, Schoukens, H, Trouwborst, A, van Hoorick, G & Verschuuren, J 2023, Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading. Society for Ecological Restoration. <https://serchapter2018.wpenginepowered.com/europe/files/2023/07/legal-assessment-of-Copa-Cogeca-objections-.pdf>

TY - BOOK

T1 - Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading

AU - Aragao, Alexandra

AU - Born, Charles-Hubert

AU - Ciscato, Eleonora

AU - Cliquet, An

AU - Decleer, Kris

AU - Dotinga, Harm

AU - Fleurke, Floor

AU - Leucci, Francesca

AU - Mauerhofer, Volkel

AU - Meertens, Matilde

AU - Mendes, Ana

AU - Reese, Moritz

AU - Schoukens, Hendrik

AU - Trouwborst, Arie

AU - van Hoorick, Geert

AU - Verschuuren, Jonathan

PY - 2023/7/6

Y1 - 2023/7/6

N2 - In their letter of 26 June 2023 Copa*Cogeca asked the members of the European Parliament’s Committee on Environment to reject the Nature Restoration Law proposal. They based their arguments for this rejection on what they considered as ‘red line’ issues, which makes the law proposal unacceptable to them.As Legal Working Group (LWG) from SERE , we analysed these ‘red line’ issues and we concluded that their red line objections against the Nature Restoration Law proposal cannot withstand legal scrutiny. Many of their concerns are already present in the Commission proposal and are further addressed in the Swedish presidency compromise proposal. Further weakening of the Nature Restoration Law is against existing EU legislation.

AB - In their letter of 26 June 2023 Copa*Cogeca asked the members of the European Parliament’s Committee on Environment to reject the Nature Restoration Law proposal. They based their arguments for this rejection on what they considered as ‘red line’ issues, which makes the law proposal unacceptable to them.As Legal Working Group (LWG) from SERE , we analysed these ‘red line’ issues and we concluded that their red line objections against the Nature Restoration Law proposal cannot withstand legal scrutiny. Many of their concerns are already present in the Commission proposal and are further addressed in the Swedish presidency compromise proposal. Further weakening of the Nature Restoration Law is against existing EU legislation.

KW - nature conservation law

KW - restoration

KW - European Law

KW - agriculture

KW - Habitats Directive

UR - https://chapter.ser.org/europe/2023/07/05/ser-europe-fends-off-disinformation-on-the-nature-restoration-law-and-calls-on-meps-to-adopt-it/

M3 - Report

BT - Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading

PB - Society for Ecological Restoration

ER -

Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

The future of agriculture in the European Union

SER Webinar - Global and local implications of the European Union Nature Restoration Law (NRL)

Wetenschappers aan kabinet: natuur is geen luxe-dingetje, stem vóór de natuurherstelwet

Cite this

Legal assessment explaining why COPA*COGECA's objections against the Nature Restoration Act proposal are misleading

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Research output

The future of agriculture in the European Union

Activities

SER Webinar - Global and local implications of the European Union Nature Restoration Law (NRL)

Press/Media

Wetenschappers aan kabinet: natuur is geen luxe-dingetje, stem vóór de natuurherstelwet

Cite this